1992
DOI: 10.1016/0047-2727(92)90071-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evading the use tax on cross-border sales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such theoretical discussions can be found in Gordon [1983], Mintz and Tulkens [1986], Braid [1987], Kanbur and Keen [1993], Trandel [1992Trandel [ , 1994, and Gordon and Neilsen [1997].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such theoretical discussions can be found in Gordon [1983], Mintz and Tulkens [1986], Braid [1987], Kanbur and Keen [1993], Trandel [1992Trandel [ , 1994, and Gordon and Neilsen [1997].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, origin-based commodity taxes can actually improve global welfare by lowering the mark-up that producers charge over marginal costs (Trandel, 1992). A similar case arises when monopolists located in different countries have different marginal costs in the no-tax equilibrium.…”
Section: Multiple Tax Rates and Incomplete Coveragementioning
confidence: 95%
“…In their paper, Haufler and Schjelderup (2004) show that tax differentials (including VAT differentials) between countries may weaken the common interest of firms in maintaining a socially harmful secret cartel. Similarly, Trandel (1992) shows that when firms charge a markup over marginal costs, cross‐border shopping will provide an incentive to firms to lower their prices which, of course, benefits consumers (it is welfare improving for both regions). These results are in line with a number of studies emphasising the welfare‐enhancing effects of tax competition.…”
Section: Cross‐border Shopping Tax Competition and Tax Coordinationmentioning
confidence: 97%