Evaluación de la dependencia física y psicológica al tabaco en fumadores mexicanos adultos, Encodat 2016

Paz-Ballesteros, Wayra Citlali; Zavala‐Arciniega, Luis; Gutiérrez-Torres, Daniela S.; Ponciano-Rodríguez, Guadalupe; Reynales-Shigematsu, Luz Myriam

doi:10.21149/9858

Cited by 13 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…To evaluate how e-cigarettes influence smoking patterns in Mexico, further research is needed, particularly on how lighter smokers use e-cigarettes. Indeed, psychological dependence47 and potential genetic factors may help to explain low levels of consumption among populations of Mexican heritage,48 whose ancestors used tobacco for centuries before European colonisation of the Americas. Our study has several limitations.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Smoking trends in Mexico, 2002–2016: before and after the ratification of the WHO’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionMexico was the first Latin American country to ratify the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) in 2004, after which it implemented some key FCTC policies (e.g., taxes, smoke-free, pictorial warnings and ad bans). This study assessed trends in the prevalence of current, daily and non-daily smoking in Mexico before and after the implementation of key FCTC policies.MethodsData were analysed from two comparable, nationally representative surveys (i.e., the National Survey on Addictions 2002, 2011 and 2016, and the Global Adult Tobacco Survey 2009 and 2015). The pooled sample comprised 100 302 persons aged 15–65 years. Changes in the prevalence of current, daily and non-daily smoking were assessed.ResultsFrom 2002 to 2016, the prevalence of current smoking fell 11% in relative terms (from 21.5% to 19.0%). The decrease was registered between 2002 and 2009, and after that, a slight increase was observed (from 16.5% in 2009 to 19% in 2016). The prevalence of daily smoking decreased by about 50% between 2002 and 2016 (from 13.5% to 7.0%) with most of the decrease occurring by 2009. Conversely, the prevalence of non-daily smoking increased by 35% between 2009 and 2016 (from 8.8% to 11.9%).ConclusionsFull implementation of the FCTC is necessary to further reduce smoking. Specific interventions may be needed to target non-daily smokers, who now comprise more than half of current smokers in Mexico.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Smoking trends in Mexico, 2002–2016: before and after the ratification of the WHO’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As a result, health personnel are less likely to advise cessation [ 5 ]. However, evidence has shown that nondaily smokers may have a similar or greater physical and psychological dependency and lower intentions to quit than daily cigarette users [ 9 , 41 , 42 ]. Nondaily smokers also perceive lower health risks than daily smokers [ 42 , 43 ], suggesting that media campaigns and cigarette pack warnings may have a limited effect on this group.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To further validate Mexico SimSmoke projections of daily and nondaily smoking, we perform two sensitivity analyses, one assuming half of the original policy effect sizes for nondaily smokers and a second one assuming half of the original effect combined with using the100-cigarettes lifetime screen for defining current smoking prevalence (S1 Report). Assuming half of the original effect, daily smoking projections are unaffected, but SimSmoke nondaily smoking projections in 2016…”

Section: Sensitivity Analysesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Studies have suggested that the increase in nondaily smoking in Mexico is related to the increase in popularity of new tobacco products, particularly flavored capsule cigarettes [ 7 ], the increase in the sale of single cigarettes and multiproduct use in the population [ 7 , 8 ], and the absence of cessation strategies targeted to nondaily smokers [ 9 ]. In addition, Mexico has implemented tobacco policies focused on daily cigarette smokers, which rarely consider nondaily and multiproduct use patterns [ 1 , 10 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Mexico SimSmoke tobacco control policy model: Development of a simulation model of daily and nondaily cigarette smoking

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Nondaily smoking has been on the rise, especially in Mexico. While Mexico has strengthened its tobacco control policies, their effects on nondaily smokers have gone largely unexamined. We developed a simulation model to estimate the impact of tobacco control policies on daily and nondaily smoking in Mexico. Methods A previously validated Mexico SimSmoke model that estimated overall trends in smoking prevalence from 2002 through 2013 was extended to 2018 and adapted to distinguish daily and nondaily smoking prevalence. The model was then validated using data from Mexican surveys through 2016. To gauge the potential effects of policies, we compared the trends in smoking under current policies with trends from policies kept at their 2002 levels. Results Between 2002 and 2016, Mexico SimSmoke underestimated the reduction in male and female daily smoking rates. For nondaily smoking, SimSmoke predicted a decline among both males and females, while survey rates showed increasing rates in both genders, primarily among ages 15–44. Of the total reduction in smoking rates predicted by the model by 2018, tax policies account for more than 55%, followed by health warnings, cessation treatment, smoke-free air laws, and tobacco control spending. Conclusions Although Mexico SimSmoke did not successfully explain trends in daily and nondaily smoking, it helps to identify gaps in surveillance and policy evaluation for nondaily smokers. Future research should consider appropriate measures of nondaily smoking prevalence, trajectories between daily and nondaily smoking, and the separate impact of tobacco control policies on each group.

show abstract

“…20 Respecto a la dependencia a la nicotina en otros países es elevada en comparación con la población estudiada. En una investigación en México, 82.3% de fumadores diarios y 98.8% de ocasionales reportaron dependencia física leve, mientras que 47.9% y 37.9%, respectivamente, presentaron dependencia psicológica moderada, 21 en cambio los datos obtenidos en el estudio en la población Lenca, el 76.6% tuvo dependencia baja y apenas el 23.4% presento dependencia moderada a la nicotina, ninguno mostro alta dependencia a pesar que se realizó solo en fumadores.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Alta prevalencia en el consumo de tabaco y desigualdades en población Lenca, Intibucá, Honduras, 2015.

Arias¹,

Mendoza²,

Escalante³

et al. 2020

RMH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Antecedentes: Aproximadamente un sexto de la población mundial tiene el hábito de fumar para una prevalencia de 24%. La OMS considera que, de no cambiar las tendencias durante el siglo XXI, el tabaco será responsable de la muerte prematura de mil millones de personas. Objetivo: Determinar la prevalencia del consumo de tabaco y la medición de desigualdades socioeconómicas en la población Lenca, Municipio de Intibucá, Intibucá, Honduras, 2015. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo transversal con análisis de asociación. Se aplicó formulario estructurado para recolectar datos generales, sociodemográficos y tabaquismo, previo consentimiento informado. Dependencia al tabaco fue evaluada con test Faguerström. Se prepararon bases de datos en Epi-info-7 y SPSS-18. Se calcularon razones de disparidad (OR). Resultados: De un total de 602 entrevistados, se identificaron 167 fumadores para una prevalencia de consumo de tabaco de 27.7%. El 76.6% (128) de fumadores tuvo dependencia baja a nicotina y 23.4% (39) dependencia moderada. La media de ingreso familiar mensual fue USD$193 en fumadores y USD$168 en no fumadores. El 40.1% (67) de fumadores gastó mensualmente en tabaco un mínimo de USD$95. No se encontró relación entre consumo de tabaco e ingreso familiar mensual (OR=0.87, IC95% 0.7-1.0) ni con analfabetismo (OR=1.20, IC95% 0.7-2.0). Discusión: No se observaron diferencias significativas entre consumo de tabaco y las variables socioeconómicas, se encontró una elevada prevalencia de consumo de tabaco en esta población en relación con otros estudios realizados en el país. Los resultados apoyan la necesidad de políticas enfocadas en prevención del tabaco en indígenas.

show abstract

Evaluación de la dependencia física y psicológica al tabaco en fumadores mexicanos adultos, Encodat 2016

Cited by 13 publications

References 28 publications

Smoking trends in Mexico, 2002–2016: before and after the ratification of the WHO’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control

Smoking trends in Mexico, 2002–2016: before and after the ratification of the WHO’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control

The Mexico SimSmoke tobacco control policy model: Development of a simulation model of daily and nondaily cigarette smoking

Alta prevalencia en el consumo de tabaco y desigualdades en población Lenca, Intibucá, Honduras, 2015.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About