Evaluasi dan Implikasi Kebijakan Pemberantasan Kejahatan Perikanan di Indonesia 2014-2018

Karim, Muhamad

doi:10.24198/jaki.v5i1.26453

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In the end, Susi issued a Letter of the Minister of MAF No. 72/2016, which limited the use of trawl in Indonesia as a relaxation of resistance to the cantrang ban (Karim, 2020) (Salsabila., et al 2021). Cantrang or trawl was officially banned in early January 2018.…”

Section: Polemics Over Lobster Seed and Cantrang Licensementioning

confidence: 99%

The Political Economy of Fisheries Development During Joko Widodo’s Regime

Nasution,

Wicaksono

2023

Politika

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article discusses the political economy of fisheries development in Indonesia and its dynamics during Joko Widodo's regime. The development of the fisheries sector, particularly marine fisheries, has faced ups and downs since Indonesia's independence. During the New Order era, fisheries development depended on foreign investment and international aid, which on several occasions has driven severe conditions in depleted fish stocks and the marginalization of small-scale fishermen. The fisheries sector began to be measured politically after the reform period when Indonesia established the Department/Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries. Even so, the direction of fisheries development has not met its consistency. When Joko Widodo served as president, he created a big vision for maritime development, namely "Global Maritime Axis," where the fisheries sector became one of the national development priorities. Jokowi appointed Susi Pudjiastuti as Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (MAF). Under Susi, the development of fisheries began to be reformed and she enacted many strict policies to deal with fisheries problems that have been occurring for decades. Susi gained many political pressures because her strict policies disrupted the oligarchic system that had controlled fisheries resources at the time. Fisheries development experienced inconsistencies from the last of 2019 until the end of 2020 because the first Minister of MAF in Jokowi's second period made contradictory policies from Susi's period. Since 2021, Indonesia's fisheries development has been using a blue economy model implemented through the regulation on measured fishing.

show abstract

Section: Polemics Over Lobster Seed and Cantrang Licensementioning

confidence: 99%

The Political Economy of Fisheries Development During Joko Widodo’s Regime

Nasution,

Wicaksono

2023

Politika

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, the next policy is actually not only improving the sustainability of fish resource stocks, increasing their economic benefits, but also being able to resolve conflicts that occur with the right resolution so that the management and utilization of fishery resources can prosper all the people. 38 National policies in the engagement sector must be studied from a multi-aspect perspective related to their implications both in the national, regional, and global scope and need to be continuously monitored with an open attitude. So that we find a way how we can adapt to these changes, without harming the national interest.…”

Section: The Framework For Transhipment Countermeasures As a Transnat...mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Countermeasures Efforts of Illegal Transshipment Impact as a Transnational Crime

Mubaroq

Putra²

2022

PLR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The impacts and disadvantages of transhipment which even threatens sustainable development shows that transhipment can be identified as a transnational crime. On the one side, there is a need for legal countermeasures for the transshipment crimes in Indonesia so it does not occur again. But on the other side, transshipment actually becomes a necessity because fish landing mostly take time so that the fish are not fresh. In addition, the transshipment countermeasures also has some obstacles because there is no agency or institution with a special task of supervising and taking action against waters crimes in Indonesian in full authority to tackle transhipment. The problem that will be discussed in this article is how is transhipment related to transnational crime? And what is the countermeasures framework for dealing transhipment related to transnational crime? The research results showed that transshipment has been regulated in international law and national law. However, transhipment can be classified as a transnational crime because it fulfills the elements of a transnational crime and it is related to other transnational crimes. So there is a recommendation for a countermeasures framework of transhipment crime as a transnational crime, namely by establishing cooperation between the central and regional governments in the field of marine and fisheries. Then other recommendations related to handling fisheries crime cases such as transhipment can be carried out through a restorative justice mechanism that charges criminals to compensate for losses and recover fish resources due to their crimes.

show abstract

“…Kebijakan ini memang menyulitkan nelayan untuk mendapatkan alternatif alat tangkap yang ramah lingkungan namun memiliki hasil tangkapan yang banyak (Puspitarini, 2019). Padahal kebijakan ini merupakan rangkaian besar dari upaya pemerintah menjaga konservasi ekosistem laut dari upaya kejahatan perikanan (Karim, 2020) Protes merupakan ekspresi kolektif dari keberatan atas tindakan atau situasi tertentu (Martinez-ebers, 2015) yang biasanya membentuk mobiliasi aktifitas untuk kepentingan yang lebih besar (Banerjee, 2020). Begitu pula yang dilakukan oleh banyak nelayan termasuk nelayan di Kecamatan Brondong, Kabupaten Lamongan.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Dampak Kebijakan Pelarangan Penggunaan Cantrang Pada Nelayan Cantrang Di Kecamatan Brondong Kabupaten Lamongan

Hanum¹

2021

Agregasi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to see the impact of the cantrang prohibition policy issued by the Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Affairs in Brondong District, Lamongan Regency. Through the Regulation of the Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Number 2 of 2015 concerning the Prohibition of Using Hela Trawl and Trawling Fishing Tools in the WPPNRI article 4 paragraph (2), the Indonesian government wants to maintain the sustainability of Indonesia's marine resources which at the same time has negative implications for the income of fishermen and other parties. others. This research is categorized into a descriptive qualitative type, the data obtained using the direct interview method, observation, and documentation that supports this research. Research shows that fishermen and related parties have suffered significant losses due to drastically reduced fish catch, which is contagious to the sluggishness of fish auction and boat building services. There is resistance from fishermen to this policy which can be resolved. Keywords: Policy Impact, Cantrang Policy, Cantrang.

show abstract

Evaluasi dan Implikasi Kebijakan Pemberantasan Kejahatan Perikanan di Indonesia 2014-2018

Cited by 5 publications

References 8 publications

The Political Economy of Fisheries Development During Joko Widodo’s Regime

The Political Economy of Fisheries Development During Joko Widodo’s Regime

The Countermeasures Efforts of Illegal Transshipment Impact as a Transnational Crime

Dampak Kebijakan Pelarangan Penggunaan Cantrang Pada Nelayan Cantrang Di Kecamatan Brondong Kabupaten Lamongan

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About