Evaluasi Properti Psikometris Dan Perbandingan Model Pengukuran Konstruk Subjective Well-Being

Akhtar, Hanif

doi:10.14710/jp.18.1.29-40

Cited by 25 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The results obtained are also in line with previous research conducted by Akhtar (2019) with subjects totaling 1.003 people with an age range of 14-50. It uses the instrument Positive Affect Negative Affect Schedule (HOT) and satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), which shows that all dimensions have a reliability value> 0,80 with item-total correlation> 0,3.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 92%

The Validity and Reliability of Subjective Well-Being Instruments in Early Adolescents

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The research aimed to produce empirical evidence about the validity and reliability of subjective well-being instruments by modifying the instruments. The research’s subjects were 394 early adolescent respondents ranging in age from 12-13 years old in Sleman regency, Yogyakarta, using a random sampling technique. The validity of subjective well-being instruments was measured by using expert judgment and calculating Gregory’s formula. Instrument reliability was measured by Cronbach’s Alpha calculation. The results show that the subjective wellbeing instrument in the modified early adolescents has good validity and reliability so that the modification of this instrument can be used to measure the condition of subjective well-being in early adolescents in Indonesia.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 92%

The Validity and Reliability of Subjective Well-Being Instruments in Early Adolescents

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Referring to a previous study conducted by Caprara et al (2012), positivity was positively correlated with life satisfaction and positive affect and negatively correlated with negative affect. Therefore, in this study, the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), which have been adapted to the Indonesian version by Akhtar (2019), were used. Both scales have been tested on 1003 respondents and the results showed a coefficient alpha of 0.828 with a corrected item-total correlation between 0.553 -0.686 for SWLS, a coefficient alpha of 0.861 with a corrected-item total correlation between 0.450 -0.664 for positive affect, and coefficient alpha of 0.853 with a corrected-item total correlation between 0.413 -0.699 for negative affect (Akhtar, 2019).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Indonesian Version of the Positivity Scale

Layyinah

Kumalasari

2022

JP3I

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Positivity, the tendency to view self, life, and the future positively, and to believe in others, was found to contribute toward an individual’s functioning based on previous studies. A positivity scale in the Indonesian version is needed to understand better Indonesian people’s functioning and improve their well-being. However, the positivity scale was not yet available for Indonesians. This study aimed to adapt the 8-item Positivity Scale into Positivity Scale Indonesian Version (PSIV) and find evidence of its psychometric properties. Data from 218 Indonesians aged 18 years or older were collected using an 8-item PSIV rated on a 5-point scale. The results showed good item discrimination indicated by its corrected-total item correlations (0.35–0.67) and a high internal consistency (α=0.826). The confirmatory factor analysis results after applying the modification model showed that the hypothesized one-factor model fit the criteria indicated by CFI=0.968, TLI=0.950, RMSEA=0.067, SRMR=0.037, and GFI=0.962. The PSIV was correlated with life satisfaction and positive and negative effects. A test-retest reliability conducted on 30 respondents showed a correlation between the first and second times of data collection. Accordingly, PSIV had adequate item discrimination, reliability, and validity. Thus, the PSIV is beneficial to assess the positivity of Indonesian people aged 18 years or older.

show abstract

“…However, in the Indonesian version it is simplified into five answer choices, from very unsuitable (1) to very suitable (5) (Afiatin et al 2016;. The value of the validity of the Indonesian version of SWSL is 0.553-0.686, with the reliability level of 0.828 (Akhtar 2019).…”

Section: Study Instrumentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Athletes’ religiosity: How it plays a role in athletes’ anxiety and life satisfaction

Guntoro

Putra

2022

HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Contribution:This study provides a new insight into the role of religiosity in anxiety and life satisfaction of athletes. This study also identifies the groups of athletes that are prone to have higher anxiety and therefore should be concerned and targeted. The findings of this study could be used as a complement strategy to increase the athletes' happiness and to reduce the anxiety during the coaching and training processes in order to be able to achieve targeted results in a competition.

show abstract

Evaluasi Properti Psikometris Dan Perbandingan Model Pengukuran Konstruk Subjective Well-Being

Cited by 25 publications

References 19 publications

The Validity and Reliability of Subjective Well-Being Instruments in Early Adolescents

The Validity and Reliability of Subjective Well-Being Instruments in Early Adolescents

Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Indonesian Version of the Positivity Scale

Athletes’ religiosity: How it plays a role in athletes’ anxiety and life satisfaction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About