Evaluate the effectiveness of breast cancer decision aids: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomize clinical trails

gao, Jinhua; Jin, Yinghui; Yu, Shao-Fu; Wu, Wang‐feng; Han, Shi-Fan

doi:10.1002/nop2.741

Cited by 17 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Unlike previous reports (Gao et al, 2021; Schapira et al, 2022; Steenbeek et al, 2021), our results showed no intervention effect on decision self-efficacy. Both groups in our study showed similar improvement from pretest to post-test.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

Efficacy of a Decision Support Intervention on Decisional Conflict Related to Hepatocellular Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Liao

Wang

et al. 2022

Clin Nurs Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of decision support intervention on treatment knowledge, decision self-efficacy, decisional conflict, and decision satisfaction in patients with hepatocellular cancer. The study was a randomized controlled trial. In all, 69 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were recruited and randomly assigned to a decision support group or a control group. Data were collected at baseline, post-test, and follow-up using self-report questionnaires. After controlling for baseline scores, the between-group difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) for treatment-related knowledge in post-test scores was 11.9 (6.1, 17.8). After controlling for baseline scores, the between-group difference (95% CI) for decisional conflict was −7.0 (−12.0, −2.0). There was no statistically significant between-group difference in decision self-efficacy and decision satisfaction. Findings supported the efficacy of decision support intervention to improve treatment knowledge and reduce decisional conflict but had no significant effect on decision self-efficacy and decision satisfaction in patients with HCC.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

Efficacy of a Decision Support Intervention on Decisional Conflict Related to Hepatocellular Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Liao

Wang

et al. 2022

Clin Nurs Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In recent literature, decision regret has been described as a negative emotion in response to a poor or unexpected treatment outcome, leading to psychological distress. Women often question whether they made the correct treatment decision 7–9,11,20–22 . Connolly and Reb 23 proposed three types of regret utilizing the decision justification theory used to examine decision regret in recent studies 24,25 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Decision regret is an undesirable experience that most women, if they could, would avoid due to the emotional toll it can inflict 7–9,20–22,24–26,33,34 . A diverse spectrum of negative emotions can be seen in women experiencing decision regret, such as distress, 7,9,30,33,35 guilt, remorse, self‐blame, or recrimination 7,8,21,30,33–35 .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A concept analysis of decision regret in women with breast cancer

Tyner

Freysteinson

2021

Nursing Forum

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this article is to understand the components of decision regret for women making breast cancer treatment decisions. Patient‐centered care models encourage women to become more active in the decision‐making process, inadvertently exposing them to the risk of experiencing decision regret. Enhancing the understanding of the concept of decision regret can offer insight into ways to mitigate this phenomenon. The Walker and Avant method was used to analyze this concept. Using PubMed, CINAHL, ERIC, Academic Search Complete, PsychINFO, SocINDEX, Joanna Briggs Institute of EBP Database, and an online dictionary, articles from 2011 to 2021 were analyzed to identify concept uses, attributes, antecedents, and consequences. Decision regret in women making breast cancer healthcare decisions is a negative cognitive‐emotional response to a treatment decision that involves counterfactual thinking with three targets of regret: outcome regret, chosen option regret, and process regret. Experiencing decision regret can reduce a woman's quality of life, inflict psychological distress, and impact future decision‐making. Unfavorable outcomes, decision uncertainty, and breakdowns in the decision‐making process can lead to decision regret. Findings provide information on identifying women experiencing decision regret and illustrate opportunities to address causative factors through patient education and support to promote optimal patient outcomes.

show abstract

“…Therefore, decision making may be in uenced by the views of family members, thereby limiting the participation of patients in this process. It is suggested that medical staff should fully evaluate the decision-making expectations and preferences of patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy (particularly those with low self-management e cacy level), actively mobilize relatives of patients with breast cancer, empower patients to actively participate in disease management and treatment decisions, and develop localized and intelligent decision-making aids for patients with breast cancer in China [27]. These measures would improve the treatment decision-making process.…”

Section: E Cacy Of Patients With Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Is At The...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Correlation Between Self-management Efficacy and Supportive Care Needs Among Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy

Huang

Cai

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: To investigate the status and relationship of supportive care needs and self-management efficacy in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.Methods: Patients with breast cancer (N=160) receiving chemotherapy were selected through convenience sampling. The general information questionnaire, 34-Item Short-Form Supportive Care Needs Survey scale, and Chinese version of Strategies Used by People to Promote Health scale were used. Results: The total supportive care needs and overall self-management efficacy scale scores were (2.80±0.46) points and (91.71±12.16) points, respectively. Spearman correlation analysis showed that the total score of self-management efficacy and those of each dimension were negatively correlated with the total score of supportive care needs and those of each dimension (P<0.05). Hierarchical regression analysis identified self-management efficacy as the main influencing factor of supportive care needs in these patients (P<0.05). Conclusions：Supportive care needs of patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy is at the higher level. Medical staff should improve the self-management efficacy of patients to meet these needs.

show abstract

Evaluate the effectiveness of breast cancer decision aids: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomize clinical trails

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Cited by 17 publications

References 39 publications

Efficacy of a Decision Support Intervention on Decisional Conflict Related to Hepatocellular Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Efficacy of a Decision Support Intervention on Decisional Conflict Related to Hepatocellular Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial

A concept analysis of decision regret in women with breast cancer

Correlation Between Self-management Efficacy and Supportive Care Needs Among Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About