2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating a dialogue-based approach to teaching about values and policy in graduate transdisciplinary environmental science programs

Abstract: This article discusses a formal evaluation of new curricular materials and activities designed to foster understanding of three key issues–expertise, risk, and sociopolitical constraints–related to values and policy in transdisciplinary environmental science. We begin by describing the three issues, along with current thinking about the most appropriate ways to address them in the context of transdisciplinary environmental science. We then describe how we created curricular materials and activities focusing on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Learning opportunities should be framed around challenging or wicked problems that demand transdisciplinary approaches and make knowledge more relevant to solving real‐world challenges (Pohl et al., 2017). Including an examination of the issues within the social context can help participants increase their understanding of the complexity of issues and understand how values, attitudes, and social relations underpin these problems (Eigenbrode et al., 2014; Hall et al., 2018). Presentations, readings, websites, and discussion of methodologies from a mix of disciplines can challenge thinking and help students integrate new concepts and ideas.…”
Section: Transferability and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Learning opportunities should be framed around challenging or wicked problems that demand transdisciplinary approaches and make knowledge more relevant to solving real‐world challenges (Pohl et al., 2017). Including an examination of the issues within the social context can help participants increase their understanding of the complexity of issues and understand how values, attitudes, and social relations underpin these problems (Eigenbrode et al., 2014; Hall et al., 2018). Presentations, readings, websites, and discussion of methodologies from a mix of disciplines can challenge thinking and help students integrate new concepts and ideas.…”
Section: Transferability and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not surprisingly, this work takes considerable time and effort, requiring a shift from disciplinary thinking, building trust and cooperation among group members, integrating different perspectives, dealing with tensions, and establishing common frameworks by which to develop goals and engage in effective action (Klenk & Meehan, 2015;Lang et al, 2012). Transdisciplinarity and interdisciplinarity often are used interchangeably, as both approaches involve the integration of knowledge across disciplines, with differences identified in transdisciplinarity's emphasis on inclusion of non-academic partners, application of knowledge, and use to address highly complex problems (Hall, Piso, Engebretson, & O'Rourke, 2018;Knapp, Reid, Fernández-Giménez, Klein, & Galvin, 2019;Lang et al, 2012;Pohl, 2011;Tress, Tress, & Fry, 2004;Wright Morton, Eigenbrode, & Martin, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In any of these contexts, active learning is better than passive absorption of content. Expertise in technical, ethical and policy domains necessary for transformations of our infrastructures is best seen as cumulative, collectively constructed, and elaborated in conversation (Hall et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussion: Knowledge Exchange As Action Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%