Evaluating a Novel Simulation Course for Prehospital Provider Resuscitation Training in Botswana

Abstract

IntroductionIn 2012, Botswana embarked on an organized public approach to prehospital medicine. One goal of the Ministry of Health (MOH) was to improve provider education regarding patient stabilization and resuscitation. Simulation-based instruction is an effective educational strategy particularly for high-risk, low-frequency events. In collaboration with partners in the United States, the team created a short, simulation-based course to teach and update prehospital providers on common field responses in this resource-limited setting. The objective of this study was to evaluate an educational program for Botswanan prehospital providers via written and simulation-based examinations.MethodsWe developed a two-day course based on a formal needs assessment and MOH leadership input. The subject matter of the simulation scenarios represented common calls to the prehospital system in Botswana. Didactic lectures and facilitated skills training were conducted by U.S. practitioners who also served as instructors for a rapid-cycle, deliberate practice simulation education model and simulation-based testing scenarios. Three courses, held in three cities in Botswana, were offered to off-duty MOH prehospital providers, and the participants were evaluated using written multiple-choice tests, videotaped traditional simulation scenarios, and self-efficacy surveys.ResultsCollectively, 31 prehospital providers participated in the three courses. The mean scores on the written pretest were 67% (standard deviation [SD], 10) and 85% (SD, 7) on the post-test (p < 0.001). The mean scores for the simulation were 42% (SD, 14.2) on the pretest and 75% (SD, 11.3) on the post-test (p < 0.001). Moreover, the intraclass correlation coefficient scores between reviewers were highly correlated at 0.64 for single measures and 0.78 for average measures (p < 0.001 for both). Twenty-one participants (68%) considered the course “extremely useful.”ConclusionBotswanan prehospital providers who participated in this course significantly improved in both written and simulation-based performance testing. General feedback from the participants indicated that the simulation scenarios were the most useful and enjoyable aspects of the course. These results suggest that this curriculum can be a useful educational tool for teaching and reinforcing prehospital care concepts in Botswana and may be adapted for use in other resource-limited settings.

Developing sustainable prehospital trauma education in Rwanda

“…Others have examined the role of lay-person disaster response training [ [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] ]. Similar to our study, in Botswana, a two-day prehospital course taught by US practitioners on a variety of prehospital care topics and not limited to trauma led to improvements in post test scores [ 25 ]. This study, though limited to trauma, demonstrates the development and implementation of formal prehospital trauma care training within an established EMS program which is unusual in the LMIC setting.…”

Developing Sustainable Prehospital Pediatric Care in Rwanda

“…The effectiveness of this course is difficult to discern because of the inconsistent delivery of written and skills examinations. In Botswana, a novel 2-day course was developed for prehospital providers that showed improvements in participants' pre– to post–course assessment scores similar to our course 37 . In that course, assessments focused on testing both simulation skills and written knowledge.…”

Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice in Healthcare Simulation: a Scoping Review

“…For example, a 2-day pre-hospital care provider course in a low resource setting consisted of didactic lectures, skills training, and multiple RCDP simulations. All participants found the course “useful”, and it resulted in significant increases in MCQ scores (pretest 67%, post-test 85%, p < 0.001) and simulation checklist performance scores (pretest 42%, post-test 95%, p < 0.001) [ 20 ]. At the K3 level, a floor staff survey found that RCDP participants had perceived improvement in leadership, communication, and role identification [ 14 ].…”