2013
DOI: 10.5753/cbie.sbie.2013.214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating an Educational System Based on Projective Augmented Reality

Abstract: Augmented Reality has the potential to play an important role in education since it can help to motivate the students and foster the interaction between the content and the learners. In this work, we explore the potential of the ARBlocks, a dynamic blocks platform for educational activities using projective augmented reality and tangible user interfaces. A semi-experiment was carried out with two first grade groups in order to attest if the tool could help the development of their literacy skills. Three differ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of this study were consistent with the results of the current literature, because all the experimental studies reported positive outcomes and effectives on behalf of AR technology application (Barreira et al, 2012;Gün, 2014;Silva et al, 2013;Tan & Lui, 2004). For example, Perez-Lopez and Contero (2013) revealed that AR technology contributed to students' achievement and longer memory retention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The findings of this study were consistent with the results of the current literature, because all the experimental studies reported positive outcomes and effectives on behalf of AR technology application (Barreira et al, 2012;Gün, 2014;Silva et al, 2013;Tan & Lui, 2004). For example, Perez-Lopez and Contero (2013) revealed that AR technology contributed to students' achievement and longer memory retention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The most common way was the teacher(s), or in some cases, schools directors, working as consultants or curators. Teachers were consulted for different purposes, such Table 5 Technologies AR is combined with Study Reference AR Combination [50], [44], [42], [74], [71], [52], [64], [38], [32], [37], [69], [49], [80], [62], [7], [36], [9], [79], [48], [31], [8], [10], [45], [53], [18], [75], [19], [20], [51], [8], [77], [30], [82], [67], [70], [76] None [13] YouTube tutorial [27] Personal blogs [28] Digital sketching [17] Notes and texts provided by the teacher […”
Section: Fig 4 Papers According To the Design Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cubillo et al [17] reports that the teachers can follow an established procedure to create content using the tool. In da Silva et al [19] and da Silva et al [20], teachers were not able to create the applications by themselves since the AR tool evaluated needs an authoring tool, but they were able to design the activities to be worked and programmers created the content accordingly.…”
Section: ] Roboticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, different activities can be done with the same set of blocks. Although preliminary, recent evaluation supported the hypothesis that the ARBlocks can help to motivate students and foster the literacy development [Silva et al 2013]. …”
Section: Arblocks and The System Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%