2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12149-020-01496-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating and comparing the image quality and quantification accuracy of SiPM-PET/CT and PMT-PET/CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…artefacts are clearly seen on all reconstructed images shown in the second raw in Figure 4−7 which manifested themselves in surge of the RPD accumulation intensity in small tumors and intensity growth was observed at the tumor lesion edges in large tumors. These results correspond to the experimental measurements carried out using physical phantoms [3,5]. The edge artefact problem casts doubt on the correctness of quantitative assessment of the RPD accumulation intensity on the tumor lesion images.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…artefacts are clearly seen on all reconstructed images shown in the second raw in Figure 4−7 which manifested themselves in surge of the RPD accumulation intensity in small tumors and intensity growth was observed at the tumor lesion edges in large tumors. These results correspond to the experimental measurements carried out using physical phantoms [3,5]. The edge artefact problem casts doubt on the correctness of quantitative assessment of the RPD accumulation intensity on the tumor lesion images.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This ultimately causes quantitative overestimate of RPD accumulation intensity. The investigations in [5] used a specially designed physical phantom. The reconstruction was carried out using OSEM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A post filtering of the image is still possible to make a noisier image more readable. However, one should be careful when pushing the RR algorithms too far (disregarding the SNR) as one might end up with artefactual images that are no more representative of the activity distribution, typically by producing edge artifacts [17,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research indicates that the optimal number of iterations for OSEM reconstruction changes when the PSF is introduced [11]. In contrast, because there is a trade-off between resolution and noise, it is necessary to retain the same degree of image noise when comparing the sums of edge strengths among different reconstruction methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%