2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2010.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating and reducing a model of radiocaesium soil-plant uptake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the clay content of all Andosols had been measured with the more aggressive US-HMP or US-pH method, the slope of RIP soil /clay relationship would have been even lower than for the Belgian soils. This result suggests that the models to predict the TF of RCs from clay content, previously developed for European soils by Absalom et al (2001) and Tarsitano et al (2011), are likely overestimating the RIP soil and, hence, underestimating the TF for Japanese soils.…”
Section: Rip Of Soils Related To Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the clay content of all Andosols had been measured with the more aggressive US-HMP or US-pH method, the slope of RIP soil /clay relationship would have been even lower than for the Belgian soils. This result suggests that the models to predict the TF of RCs from clay content, previously developed for European soils by Absalom et al (2001) and Tarsitano et al (2011), are likely overestimating the RIP soil and, hence, underestimating the TF for Japanese soils.…”
Section: Rip Of Soils Related To Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…2a). This result may imply that the models developed by Absalom et al (2001) and Tarsitano et al (2011) likely underestimate the TF even more for Andosols than other soils in Japan. The correlation coefficient for the non-Andosols alone (Fig.…”
Section: Rip Of Soils Related To Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing for relationships between observed impact (e.g., crop yield) and weather would provide a top-level justification for combining models of impact and climate (e.g., Challinor et al, 2003), as would the existence of significant feedbacks between impact and climate (e.g., river flow impact on ocean circulation; carbon cycle; or albedo). Several authors have selectively removed model components or fixed parameters, and then retested model performance (e.g., Crout et al, 2009;Tarsitano et al, 2011). This may be challenging with large, complex models.…”
Section: Does Uncertainty Increase With Greater Integration Of Impacts?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, the inter-nested calculations of mechanistic models can be simplified by constants set by Bayesian statistical methods based on the likehood. The comprehensive calculations of the likehood is performed by numerical methods such as Markov Chain Monte Carlo.This methodology has been successfully adopted by Tarsitano et al (2011) for modelling radiocesium soil-plant uptake in which 18 variables (model input and variables) where reduced to 13. The simpler model was outperforming the more complex model because over-parametrization had occurred during the development of the latter.…”
Section: Why and Which Plant Nutrition Models What For?mentioning
confidence: 99%