2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating carbon fluxes of global forest ecosystems by using an individual tree-based model FORCCHN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
5
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Soil data were taken from the Harmonized World Soil Database (HWSD) (Fao/Iiasa/Isric/Isscas/Jrc, ). Ma et al () had successfully applied this soil database worldwide using the original FORCCHN model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Soil data were taken from the Harmonized World Soil Database (HWSD) (Fao/Iiasa/Isric/Isscas/Jrc, ). Ma et al () had successfully applied this soil database worldwide using the original FORCCHN model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daily photosynthesis (gross primary production; GPP ), transpiration, soil processes and respiration (including maintenance ( R A and R B ) and growth ( R G ) respiration) of a tree were calculated using the dynamic carbon model FORCCHN (Ma et al, ). The original individual tree‐based model, FORCCHN, is driven by daily meteorological data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At the end of the year, this cumulative 'buffer carbon pool' is primarily used to support the growth of canopy height and basal diameter increment of each tree on each simulated plot. As a preamble to applying the FORC-CHN model to estimate global carbon uptake by forest ecosystems, Ma et al (2017) used the CO 2 flux measurements from 37 eddy covariance flux sites located between ∼38 • S to ∼70 • N to examine the FORCCHN's performance. In these initial tests, model simulated higher correlations in gross primary production (GPP) for the 37 sites (correlations averaging 0.72 across predicted and observed daily across the 37 sites), ecosystem respiration (ER, average correlations of 0.70) and net ecosystem production (NEP, average correlations of 0.53) across all forest biomes.…”
Section: Examples Of Global Change Issues and Gap Model Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%