2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating carbon sequestration for conservation agriculture and tillage systems in Cambodia using the EPIC model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crop residue cover for conservation tillage typically ranges from 30% to 60% after harvest (Hively et al., 2018) and crop residue cover in our simulation was 46%. Typical conservation tillage depth ranges from 15 to 20 cm (Le et al., 2018); the simulation presented here uses a 20 cm tillage depth. This approach will yield lower erosion estimates than would occur from conventional tillage and so the results presented in this paper are a conservative estimate of the cumulative erosional loss over the full 100‐year simulation period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crop residue cover for conservation tillage typically ranges from 30% to 60% after harvest (Hively et al., 2018) and crop residue cover in our simulation was 46%. Typical conservation tillage depth ranges from 15 to 20 cm (Le et al., 2018); the simulation presented here uses a 20 cm tillage depth. This approach will yield lower erosion estimates than would occur from conventional tillage and so the results presented in this paper are a conservative estimate of the cumulative erosional loss over the full 100‐year simulation period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biomass of each individual crop, including cover crops, were satisfactorily replicated with all of the points close to the 1:1 curve [53] and the percent bias (PBIAS) within the 25% limit as suggested by [52], except for cassava (−27%) and maize (−36%) [50,63]. The SOC R 2 of each treatment within each cropping system ranged from 0.65 to 0.99 (p < 0.001) and the percent bias (PBIAS) ≤ 13% [53].…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The soil properties used as the initial soil input (Table A1) [50,53,63]. The R 2 values ranged from 0.62 to 0.88 for each upland rice, soybean, cassava, and maize yields [63].…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conservation agriculture was a new agricultural system and technology system based on the sustainable development of agriculture. Its main objective was to achieve economically and ecologically sustainable agricultural production through the integrated management of available land, water, and biological resources [64]. Conservation agriculture cut off the connection between the evaporative surface and the soil capillary, effectively restraining soil evaporation and improving water availability [64,65].…”
Section: Conservation Agriculture Has a Positive Effect On Soil Desiccation Restorationmentioning
confidence: 99%