2007
DOI: 10.4018/jeis.2007070104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating ERP Implementation Choices Using AHP

Abstract: An enterprise resource planning (ERP) system is an integrated software solution, typically offered by a vendor as a package that supports the seamless integration of all the information flowing through a company. Business information systems is an area of the greatest significance in any business enterprise today. ERP projects are a growing segment of this vital area. The objective of customization in ERP implementation is to achieve a fit between the ERP system and the process that the system supports. Widesp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In theory, the firm could not even count on an ingenious application of the technology to distinguish itself because even its use is standardised and incorporated into the infrastructure: by adopting an ERP system with the ''best practices'' that are embedded in it, the firm is seen to equal the leading enterprises in its sector or industry. Moreover, customisation of ERP appears to be very risky [87], and requires very special capabilities [72]. As customisation is also very time-consuming and costly, and deprives the firm of upgrades to the standard product, it is not surprising that many propose a ''vanilla'' approach to ERP implementation [86].…”
Section: Generic Versus Installed Erp Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theory, the firm could not even count on an ingenious application of the technology to distinguish itself because even its use is standardised and incorporated into the infrastructure: by adopting an ERP system with the ''best practices'' that are embedded in it, the firm is seen to equal the leading enterprises in its sector or industry. Moreover, customisation of ERP appears to be very risky [87], and requires very special capabilities [72]. As customisation is also very time-consuming and costly, and deprives the firm of upgrades to the standard product, it is not surprising that many propose a ''vanilla'' approach to ERP implementation [86].…”
Section: Generic Versus Installed Erp Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The successful implementation of an ERP depends on the match between ERP functionality and support to organizational processes [30], [36]. In the case of localization it is necessary to bring these new features to the specific country or location.…”
Section: Proposed Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ERP systems are not 'built' in the sense that a master architect envisions the parts and their relationships; rather they evolve into existence and change through their life cycles as new shared pieces of functionality are built, existing intra-organizational systems connect to become shared, and shared parts of the system are disintegrated as soon as needs of sharing business processes and data disappear. • Configuration: This perspective is concerned with ERP configuration-specific challenges [6,[13][14][15]17,18,22,23]. Configurations create system capabilities far beyond the sum of the ERP components' individual capabilities, which allows the resulting system to qualitatively acquire new properties as a result of its configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%