“…Disruption of several resting-state networks in AD have been reported, including the default mode network (DMN), involved in memory formation and retrieval (Andrews-Hanna, 2012) and self-related processing (L. Zhang et al, 2020), frontoparietal network (FPN), flexibly controlling and interacting with other brain networks (Marek & Dosenbach, 2018), the salience network (SN), directing attention toward or away from internal processing in concert with the DMN (Menon & Uddin, 2010), somatomotor network (SMN) and visual network (Mosimann, Felblinger, Ballinari, Hess, & Muri, 2004). Previous studies have ignored dynamic nature of FC and mostly focused on assessing ‘static’ FC which represents mean connectivity over the period of scanning (Damoiseaux, Prater, Miller, & Greicius, 2012; Greicius, Srivastava, Reiss, & Menon, 2004; Sorg, Riedl, Perneczky, Kurz, & Wohlschlager, 2009; Zhao, Lu, Metmer, Li, & Lu, 2018). Most recently, several studies have provided empirical evidences in healthy subjects (Cabral et al, 2017; Larabi et al, 2020; Maleki Balajoo, Asemani, Khadem, & Soltanian-Zadeh, 2020) and psychiatric (Figueroa et al, 2019; Sakoglu et al, 2010) and neurological (Fu et al, 2019; Gu et al, 2020; Jones et al, 2012; Kim et al, 2017; Niu et al, 2019; Schumacher et al, 2019; Sourty et al, 2016) disorders that not only the intrinsic brain FC at rest is dynamic during the period of scanning (Allen et al, 2014; Betzel, Fukushima, He, Zuo, & Sporns, 2016; Chang & Glover, 2010; Hutchison et al, 2013), but also temporal properties of FC reconfiguration over time are associated with symptoms, behavioral and cognitive performance (Cabral et al, 2017; Figueroa et al, 2019; Gu et al, 2020; Larabi et al, 2020; Tian, Li, Wang, & Yu, 2018; Viviano, Raz, Yuan, & Damoiseaux, 2017).…”