2009 15th IEEE International on-Line Testing Symposium 2009
DOI: 10.1109/iolts.2009.5195990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating large grain TMR and selective partial reconfiguration for soft error mitigation in SRAM-based FPGAs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Implemented methods for the synchronization utilized the second approach. We used methods similar to [14] and [13], the state synchronization for FSM-based part of the system was combined with roll forward recovery for the application part of the system. We did not use any circuit for predicting future state as in [14] because SPI communication with MCP2515 circuit in HW layer should not be interrupted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Implemented methods for the synchronization utilized the second approach. We used methods similar to [14] and [13], the state synchronization for FSM-based part of the system was combined with roll forward recovery for the application part of the system. We did not use any circuit for predicting future state as in [14] because SPI communication with MCP2515 circuit in HW layer should not be interrupted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used methods similar to [14] and [13], the state synchronization for FSM-based part of the system was combined with roll forward recovery for the application part of the system. We did not use any circuit for predicting future state as in [14] because SPI communication with MCP2515 circuit in HW layer should not be interrupted. Thus, waiting for an inactive state is in this case better solution than to allow to perform the synchronization in various states of the CANCTRL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Very similar to the already mentioned approaches, a so-called Generic Partial Reconfiguration Controller receives error signals from reconfigurable modules and triggers ondemand scrubbing if required [Straka et al 2010b]. Azambuja et al also use majority voters as failure detection mechanisms and scrub a faulty reconfigurable module only after a failure has been detected [Azambuja et al 2008;Azambuja et al 2009]. The authors emphasise the increased repair speed compared to a full reconfiguration.…”
Section: Methodology Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are, however, also some drawbacks like the classic problem of data re-synchronisation after repair. Rather early work in this field has been presented for instance by Paulsson et al [8], [9] and Azambuja et al [10], [11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%