2015 3rd International Conference on Applied Computing and Information Technology/2nd International Conference on Computational 2015
DOI: 10.1109/acit-csi.2015.46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Optimal Arousal Level during the Task Based on Performance and Positive Mood: Extracting Indices Reflecting the Relationship among Arousal, Performance, and Mood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the literature surrounding somatic arousal focuses on acute symptoms (Satpute et al, 2019; Fan et al, 2015), rather than as a trait in which some individuals are more likely to have more pronounced somatic arousal responses. Furthermore, studies investigating somatic arousal tend to use sparse tasks, such as viewing emotional photos (Hillman et al, 2004) or completing memory tasks (Sawai et al, 2015), and behavioural measures of somatic arousal, such as measuring heart rate variability (Graham et al, 2000). However, simple, sparse tasks, such as photo viewing and memory tasks, do not reflect the complexity of stimuli encountered in real-life.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the literature surrounding somatic arousal focuses on acute symptoms (Satpute et al, 2019; Fan et al, 2015), rather than as a trait in which some individuals are more likely to have more pronounced somatic arousal responses. Furthermore, studies investigating somatic arousal tend to use sparse tasks, such as viewing emotional photos (Hillman et al, 2004) or completing memory tasks (Sawai et al, 2015), and behavioural measures of somatic arousal, such as measuring heart rate variability (Graham et al, 2000). However, simple, sparse tasks, such as photo viewing and memory tasks, do not reflect the complexity of stimuli encountered in real-life.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%