Evaluating Polish digital libraries from the perspective of non-academic users

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe and evaluate the role played by digital libraries in Polish society, particularly in relation to users who are not in education or professionally engaged in academic work. Design/methodology/approach – Results are presented from a survey of non-academic users, identified as one of the key groups of digital library users in an exploratory survey in 2008-2009. The targeted survey was carried out by sending e-mails to persons who had supplied their addresses in the first survey or had set up accounts with the Digital Library of Wielkopolska. Analysis was also made of e-mail correspondence between digital library users and librarians, and data from digital library server logs, during 2008-2013. Findings – The research provided three interesting results. The first is that the creation of digital libraries in Poland has caused a significant number of people to pursue an interest in genealogical or local historical research. The second result is that the evaluations of digital libraries made by non-academics do not differ significantly from those made by students and academics. The third is the fact that at present, approximately 50 per cent of digital library users in the non-academic category are over 50 years of age. Originality/value – This is the first comprehensive study on the use of digital libraries in Poland by non-academic users. It shows what role digital libraries play, and to what extent, in the stimulation of cultural activity in Polish society.

Evaluating digital libraries: a systematised review

“…As Figure suggests, the majority of studies were focused on evaluating the quality of digital libraries’ services from the perspective of the users (Ahmad & Abawajy, ; Amannollahi‐Nik, Alipoorhafezi & Matlabi, ; Amini, ; Garibay, Gutiérrez & Figueroa, ; Helena Vinagre, Gaspar Pinto & Ochôa, ; Jafar‐Begloo, Hamidi, Anvari & Rouhani, ; Kyrillidou & Giersch, ; Lai, Chiu, Huang, Chen & Huang, ; Moreira, Gonçalves, Laender & Fox, ; Naiej, Noroozi & Hamidi, ; Sohrabi, Farzaneh & Reisi, ; Yousefzadeh‐Najdi, ). The second most frequent focus of research was on digital libraries as a whole (including analysing the various aspects of digital libraries) (Al‐Dini, ; Cemal, Doğan, Özlem & Sacit, ; Fuhr et al., ; Górny, Catlow & Mazurek, ; Hoe‐Lian Goh et al., ; Jose, ; Masoudnia & Ali‐Ebadi, ; Tripathi & Jeevan, ; Xie, , ). Studies are conducted to:…”

“…Among quantitative methods, the survey and descriptive methods have been the dominant research methods. Among the quantitative data collection methods, the researcher developed a questionnaire was the most frequently used (Adabi & Jalal-Dizegi, 2013;Ahmad & Abawajy, 2014;Al-Dini, 2011;Atılgan & Bayram, 2006;Fazeli-Najafabadi, Shabani, Rajaiipour & Sharifmoghadam, 2014;Frias-Martinez et al, 2009;G orny et al, 2015;Hariri & Nazari, 2012;Hariri et al, 2014;Jabeen et al, 2017;Jafar-Begloo et al, 2014;Jeng, 2006;Joo & Yeon Lee, 2011;Kyrillidou & Giersch, 2005;Masoudnia & Ali-Ebadi, 2013;Meyyappan et al, 2004;Naiej et al, 2012;Tramullas et al, 2013;Xie, 2006Xie, , 2008Yousefzadeh-Najdi, 2013). Other methods used were:…”