2018
DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating predisposition and training in shaping the musician's brain: the need for a developmental perspective

Abstract: The study of music training as a model for structural plasticity has evolved significantly over the past 15 years. Neuroimaging studies have identified characteristic structural brain alterations in musicians compared to nonmusicians in school-age children and adults, using primarily cross-sectional designs. Despite this emerging evidence and advances in pediatric neuroimaging techniques, hardly any studies have examined brain development in early childhood (before age 8) in association with musical training, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
(230 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Longitudinal neuroimaging investigation is needed to identify whether the neural correlates of phonological processing observed in musically trained children manifest as a direct result of training, or whether these children show predispositions that may be advantageous for both music and reading-related processes. In order to distinguish training effects from potential predispositions, studies are needed that track development from prior to the onset of both formal reading instruction and musical training ( Zuk and Gaab, 2018 ). Taken together, future studies are needed to investigate the precise role and developmental age in which music may have the most positive impact on the trajectories of typical and atypical reading development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longitudinal neuroimaging investigation is needed to identify whether the neural correlates of phonological processing observed in musically trained children manifest as a direct result of training, or whether these children show predispositions that may be advantageous for both music and reading-related processes. In order to distinguish training effects from potential predispositions, studies are needed that track development from prior to the onset of both formal reading instruction and musical training ( Zuk and Gaab, 2018 ). Taken together, future studies are needed to investigate the precise role and developmental age in which music may have the most positive impact on the trajectories of typical and atypical reading development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is not clear to what extent the differences between musically naive and proficient individuals are the result of musical training itself. Based on cross-sectional studies only, it is not possible to exclude that these differences are, at least partially, a consequence of some natural predispositions; a typical nature-or-nurture question ( Zatorre, 2013 ; Zuk and Gaab, 2018 ). In favor of training-related plasticity speaks research showing that the age of the musical training onset ( Schlaug et al, 1995 ; Amunts et al, 1997 ; Steele et al, 2013 ), a longer duration of training ( Elbert et al, 1995 ; Groussard et al, 2014 ), or greater training intensity ( Gaser and Schlaug, 2003 ; Bengtsson et al, 2005 ; Schneider et al, 2005 ) correlate with the magnitude of white and gray matter changes.…”
Section: Insights From Musical Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further studies are needed with larger samples followed up for longer periods (Zuk and Gaab, 2018). Ideally, the first evaluation should occur during either the preschool age, or the primary school and repeated observations should be collected until the end of secondary school.…”
Section: Music Education At School: Too Little and Too Late?mentioning
confidence: 99%