2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.07.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Surgical Resident Needle Insertion Skill Gains in Central Venous Catheterization Training

Abstract: Background: Training for ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheterization (CVC) is typically conducted on static manikin simulators with real-time feedback from a skilled observer. Dynamic haptic robotic trainers (DHRT) are an alternative method that simulates various patient anatomies and provides consistent feedback for each insertion. This study evaluates CVC needle insertion efficiency and skill gains of both methods. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two first-year surgical residents were trained by placing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the overall procedure, the experts took less time to complete the procedure and its stages, which coincides with the differences found between experts and novices regarding the procedural time [ 10 , 15 , 17 , 18 ]. Furthermore, although it is expected that novices become faster as they receive training [ 25 ], we believe that the improvement in this variable is not sufficient to provide feedback to novices on the relevant aspects to become CVA experts, making it necessary to determine the performance of other objective indicators such as biomechanical variables. Moreover, shorter procedural times are a consequence of higher expertise, and taken alone, they do not predict performance in itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the overall procedure, the experts took less time to complete the procedure and its stages, which coincides with the differences found between experts and novices regarding the procedural time [ 10 , 15 , 17 , 18 ]. Furthermore, although it is expected that novices become faster as they receive training [ 25 ], we believe that the improvement in this variable is not sufficient to provide feedback to novices on the relevant aspects to become CVA experts, making it necessary to determine the performance of other objective indicators such as biomechanical variables. Moreover, shorter procedural times are a consequence of higher expertise, and taken alone, they do not predict performance in itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, stage 4 (catheter placement and guide-wire removal) presented similar biomechanical values between hands, but with notable differences between groups. This stage highlights that expertise allowed the experts to accomplish specific tasks more efficiently and more quickly [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the first half of the survey participants were tasked with reading statements about the usefulness of specific LCNIS GUI features and answering how true they felt a statement was on a scale of 1-7, 1 being "not true at all" and 7 being "very true". In the second half of the survey, participants were asked more general questions about the usefulness of their experience [12].…”
Section: Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These metrics also identified subjects who struggled with needle insertion, whereas commonly used checklists for rating skills were not able to identify this deficiency. Similarly, Chen et al used an EM sensor for analyzing surgery residents' skill during central venous catheterization (CVC) procedures [17]. Results from their study demonstrated a significant increase in the average pass rate for the procedure while significant decreases were noted in the average angle of insertion, path length, and jerk after training.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%