2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-04293-6_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Sustainability of Prefabrication Methods in Comparison with Traditional Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This literature review is focused mainly on the study of concrete walls with structural function. (Moradibistouni et al, 2018).…”
Section: Technology and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This literature review is focused mainly on the study of concrete walls with structural function. (Moradibistouni et al, 2018).…”
Section: Technology and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the traditional construction method, prefabrication has significant environmental benefits throughout a project's lifecycle, including the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions [43], reduction of on-site construction waste [18] and reduction of material usage [27]. These reductions can enhance public health and can combat climate change, which is the fundamental goal suggested by the International Energy Agency (IEA) [63,64]. The in-factory manufacturing environment creates a lower rate of defects and re-work, and reduces waste generated during material handling, movement and storage on the construction site and material recycling processes [52].…”
Section: Benefits Of Prefabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15,23,40,42,46] Aesthetic options Visual appearance of internal and external of the building. [1,2,15,16,22,41,45] Labor availability The amount of available labor to need. [1,15,39] Sustainability 2019, 11, 5658 6 of 15…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%