2023
DOI: 10.3390/s23073440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Synthetic Medical Images Using Artificial Intelligence with the GAN Algorithm

Abstract: In recent years, considerable work has been conducted on the development of synthetic medical images, but there are no satisfactory methods for evaluating their medical suitability. Existing methods mainly evaluate the quality of noise in the images, and the similarity of the images to the real images used to generate them. For this purpose, they use feature maps of images extracted in different ways or distribution of images set. Then, the proximity of synthetic images to the real set is evaluated using diffe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…F1 score is calculated as the harmonic mean of the precision and recall values [ 33 ], which indicates better target detection accuracy [ 34 ]. The F1 score ranges between 0 and 1, with a higher value indicating better model performance, as detailed in these papers [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F1 score is calculated as the harmonic mean of the precision and recall values [ 33 ], which indicates better target detection accuracy [ 34 ]. The F1 score ranges between 0 and 1, with a higher value indicating better model performance, as detailed in these papers [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, if we turn to the issue of evaluating the quality of the developed method, it is known that today various methods have been developed for the evaluation of synthetic data. However, some are designed to evaluate synthetic images [ 33 ], others to determine the level of security [ 34 ], and others to evaluate the difference between the distributions of synthetic and real images [ 35 ]. However, none of the above methods were suitable for evaluating the proposed method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leveraging these advanced artificial intelligence methods could enable robust, automatic sarcopenia quantification and staging from routinely acquired CT, MRI, or ultrasound scans. This would facilitate large-scale screening, enhance reliability compared to manual evaluation, and reduce costs [ 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 ]. Further research should explore fuzzy logic and deep learning for sarcopenia diagnosis and validate these techniques on diverse, clinically relevant datasets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%