2016
DOI: 10.1071/en15124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the concentration addition approach for describing expected toxicity of a ternary metal mixture (Ni, Cu, Cd) using metal speciation and response surface regression

Abstract: Environmental contextEnvironmental quality guidelines are often based on an ‘additive’ approach using single metal toxicity values. We evaluated the ‘additive’ approach by testing it on three priority pollutant metals (Ni, Cu, Cd), and found that the toxicity of the metal mixture was less than additive when dose was expressed as total metal concentration, but it was additive when dose was expressed as bioavailable metal. We suggest that for metal mixtures, a more realistic indicator of risk is provided by calc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mixture toxicity was assessed using both the independent action and concentration addition models. Concentrations were expressed as calculated free ion activities ( c i ) for the concentration addition model because this accounts for metal bioavailability and thus provides more realistic risk predictions for metal mixtures (Gopalapillai and Hale 2016). Predicted relative responses (PRRs) according to concentration addition and independent action were calculated for each mixture treatment as in Jonker et al (2005): 8em Concentration addition -.25em bold: 2.5em 0.25em TU = i = 1 n c i EC PRR , i = i = 1 n c i c b , i × ( PRR 1 S i 1 ) 1 b i = 1 Independent action -0.25em bold: 2.25em PRR = i = 1 n RR i …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixture toxicity was assessed using both the independent action and concentration addition models. Concentrations were expressed as calculated free ion activities ( c i ) for the concentration addition model because this accounts for metal bioavailability and thus provides more realistic risk predictions for metal mixtures (Gopalapillai and Hale 2016). Predicted relative responses (PRRs) according to concentration addition and independent action were calculated for each mixture treatment as in Jonker et al (2005): 8em Concentration addition -.25em bold: 2.5em 0.25em TU = i = 1 n c i EC PRR , i = i = 1 n c i c b , i × ( PRR 1 S i 1 ) 1 b i = 1 Independent action -0.25em bold: 2.25em PRR = i = 1 n RR i …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chlorophyta (green alga) Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (formerly known as Selenastrum capricornutum) has been used in standard methods developed by international agencies (such as: ASTM, APHA, OECD, ISO and USEPA) as a reliable indicator of toxicity (Janssen and Heijerick, 2003) due to its ecological relevance and higher sensitivity than invertebrates, fish and other standard test organisms to a wide range of hazardous substances, including metals (Geis et al, 2000; Rojí ckov a and Mar s alek, 1999). Thus, in the present work, Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata was selected to evaluate the toxicity of the environmental samples.…”
Section: Algae Chronic Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This framework has allowed for the determination of noninteractive, antagonistic and synergistic effects in various metal mixture toxicity studies [8][9][10][11][12]. Numerous studies have examined the interactive effects of metal mixtures on invertebrates [11][12][13][14], fish [14,15], and higher plants [16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%