1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70153-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the effect of soft lining materials on the growth of yeast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biofilm formation on inert biomaterials has been extensively investigated, with numerous in vitro and in vivo biofilm models utilized 13. For silicone elastomers, with intended use as denture soft‐lining materials or maxillofacial prostheses, many models have involved incubating the selected material statically with a pure culture of C. albicans for an extended period of time 4, 10, 14–18. This method, however, does not take into account the competitive effects of the natural mixed oral microflora on hyphal penetration into silicone,19 nor does it include any of the shear force effects or flow of nutrients as experienced in the oral cavity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biofilm formation on inert biomaterials has been extensively investigated, with numerous in vitro and in vivo biofilm models utilized 13. For silicone elastomers, with intended use as denture soft‐lining materials or maxillofacial prostheses, many models have involved incubating the selected material statically with a pure culture of C. albicans for an extended period of time 4, 10, 14–18. This method, however, does not take into account the competitive effects of the natural mixed oral microflora on hyphal penetration into silicone,19 nor does it include any of the shear force effects or flow of nutrients as experienced in the oral cavity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, similar research efforts pale in comparison for the porcelain surface 13,[15][16][17]22,23) . Therefore, in this study, both surface roughness and aging in saliva were included as primary determinants in the evaluation of C. albicans adhesion on the porcelain material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the adhesion mechanism of this microorganism on intraoral prosthetic materials, numerous research studies have been conducted to examine this concern and gain more insight [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] . Paling in comparison, on the other hand, are the investigative efforts on the effects arising from the surface variations of porcelain materials, and the related long-term alterations, on Candida adhesion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context it was observed that proliferation of fungi (Candida ssp.) was closely associated with poor denture hygiene [121,122]. The tendency toward fungal colonization could be reduced if the permanently soft relining material were sealed with a particular varnish [86].…”
Section: Microbial Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adherence or accumulation of Candida albicans was promoted by a rough surface structure of PMMA-based dentures. Permanent soft, porous relining materials promoted adhesion in some patients, but not in all [92,93,120,122]. Besides Candida albicans, other microorganisms were found on dentures at higher concentrations.…”
Section: Microbial Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%