2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the effectiveness of land use plans in containing urban expansion: An integrated view

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
50
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…built an integrated framework to distinguish the corresponding degrees of planning effectiveness. They emphasized that non-conforming outcomes may be guided by planning goals and hence contribute to realizing them [7]. The qualitative method cannot give a direct causality to how zoning-land use mismatch takes place.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…built an integrated framework to distinguish the corresponding degrees of planning effectiveness. They emphasized that non-conforming outcomes may be guided by planning goals and hence contribute to realizing them [7]. The qualitative method cannot give a direct causality to how zoning-land use mismatch takes place.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, existing research has a relatively simple method for judging the conformity of planning implementation results. However, when China controls the expansion of construction land, it adopts the combination of top-down quota control and delineation of growth control zones [5,7,14]. Therefore, when discriminating whether the implementation result of planning belongs to non-conformance, the following are necessary: (1) discriminating whether the actual land use is in the scope of planning permission in spatial position, and (2) further discussing whether its land use has planning permission even beyond the scope of planning, that is, the planning reservation newly added land development quota.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations