Evaluating the effectiveness of whistleblower protection: A new index

Baljija, Shpresa Kaçiku; Min, Kyoung-Sun

doi:10.1017/dap.2023.20

Cited by 5 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Melakukan kolaborasi dengan pihak eksternal sangat dibutuhkan untuk menciptakan sinergi dalam memerangi korupsi dan meningkatkan pemahaman bersama terkait praktik-praktik yang harus dicegah. Misalnya, badan anti-korupsi Kosovo Anti Corruption Agency (ACA), Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission of South Korea (ACRC), dan Crime and Corruption Commission of Queensland (CCC), dan di Indonesia terdapat Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) (Baljija & Min, 2023;Brown, 2009;Chang et al, 2017). Upaya mengatasi korupsi harus melibatkan berbagai pihak, seperti polisi, masyarakat, pemerintah, badan anti-korupsi, organisasi atau institusi dan pihak lain yang berhubungan.…”

Section: Dukungan Dari Organisasiunclassified

“…Organisasi yang memiliki budaya dalam organisasinya untuk melarang tindakan pembalasan akan lebih mendorong individu untuk melakukan tindakan whistleblowing (Dorasamy & Pillay, 2011a). Mekanisme pengembangan protokol dalam memastikan kerahasiaan dan anonimitas pelapor, menjadi prioritas utama untuk memitigasi faktor risiko yang terkait dengan pembalasan (Baljija & Min, 2023).…”

Section: Ketakutan Akan Pembalasanunclassified

“…Perlindungan hukum terhadap whistleblower dapat mendukung seseorang dalam melaporkan korupsi, penipuan atau kesalahan (Baljija & Min, 2023). Terdapat beberapa perlindungan hukum bagi whistleblower pada berbagai negara (Hansson, 2012;Said et al, 2017 (Chang et al, 2017;Cheliatsidou et al, 2023;Dorasamy & Pillay, 2011b;Hansson, 2012;Zipparo, 1999).…”

Section: Kurangnya Perlindungan Hukumunclassified

“…Saluran pelaporan harus didefinisikan secara jelas untuk memfasilitasi pengungkapan dan meningkatkan kepercayaan terhadap sistem (Baljija & Min, 2023). Kurangnya informasi atau ketidakjelasan prosedur dan kriteria pelaporan dapat membuat individu merasa bingung atau tidak yakin apa yang seharusnya dilaporkan dan bagaimana melaporkannya.…”

Section: Kurangnya Kepercayaan Pada Sistem Pelaporanunclassified

“…Keterbukaan organisasi mengenai whistleblowing sering dianggap sebagai faktor penentu seseorang akan mengambil suatu tindakan pelaporan atau tidak (Prysmakova & Evans, 2022). Jumlah laporan praktik korupsi mungkin relatif kecil, ketika masyarakat tidak mempercayai pemerintahnya dalam hal penanganan laporan dari pelapor kecurangan (Baljija & Min, 2023). Dalam hal ini, meskipun korupsi merajalela di pemerintahan, namun masyarakat tidak memiliki minat untuk melaporkan korupsi karena kurangnya kepercayaan pada sistem pelaporan, maka akan berdampak pada gagalnya mencerminkan efektivitas dari whistleblowing (Baljija & Min, 2023).…”

Section: Kurangnya Kepercayaan Pada Sistem Pelaporanunclassified

See 4 more Smart Citations

Whistleblowing dan Korupsi Pada Sektor Publik: A Systematic Review

Paraswansa,

Utomo

2024

JAA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: This research aims to identify the factors that influence whistleblowing, and also analyze the impact and consequences of implementing whistleblowing in combating corruption in the public sector. Methodology/approach: This research is a qualitative study using the Systematic Review method to examine 26 research articles guided by the PRISMA protocol. Findings: The results show that there are two factors that influence an individual's decision to do whistleblowing, first, the factors that encourage individuals to whistleblowing consist of rewards, ethical awareness, and organizational support, second, factors inhibiting an individual's decision to whistleblowing consist of fear of retaliation, lack of legal protection, lack of trust in the reporting system, and the absence of education and training regarding the importance of whistleblowing. Meanwhile, whistleblowing has a positive impact on preventing and combating corruption. Then, whistleblowing can also increase organizational transparency and accountability, while whistleblowers often face negative consequences, such as demotion, dismissal, blacklisting, and receiving negative responses from the organization. Practical and Theoretical contribution/Originality: This research contributes to providing additional insight for policy makers in developing and improving anti-corruption policies in the context of whistleblowing in the public sector. Research Limitation: The limitations of this research are that in this study there were only 26 articles studied and the database source was limited to Scopus only. Purpose: This research aims to identify the factors that influence whistleblowing, and also analyze the impact and consequences of implementing whistleblowing in combating corruption in the public sector. Methodology/approach: This research is a qualitative study using the Systematic Review method to examine 26 research articles guided by the PRISMA protocol. Findings: The results show that there are two factors that influence an individual's decision to do whistleblowing, first, the factors that encourage individuals to whistleblowing consist of rewards, ethical awareness, and organizational support, second, factors inhibiting an individual's decision to whistleblowing consist of fear of retaliation, lack of legal protection, lack of trust in the reporting system, and the absence of education and training regarding the importance of whistleblowing. Meanwhile, whistleblowing has a positive impact on preventing and combating corruption. Then, whistleblowing can also increase organizational transparency and accountability, while whistleblowers often face negative consequences, such as demotion, dismissal, blacklisting, and receiving negative responses from the organization. Practical and Theoretical contribution/Originality: This research contributes to providing additional insight for policy makers in developing and improving anti-corruption policies in the context of whistleblowing in the public sector. Research Limitation: The limitations of this research are that in this study there were only 26 articles studied and the database source was limited to Scopus only.

show abstract

Section: Dukungan Dari Organisasiunclassified

Section: Ketakutan Akan Pembalasanunclassified

Section: Kurangnya Perlindungan Hukumunclassified

Section: Kurangnya Kepercayaan Pada Sistem Pelaporanunclassified

See 3 more Smart Citations

Whistleblowing dan Korupsi Pada Sektor Publik: A Systematic Review

Paraswansa,

Utomo

2024

JAA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“Is my voicing up linked to social pain I bear”: examining the correlates of internal whistleblowing

Sethi,

Madan

2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeUndertaking the theoretical lens of “The need to belong” theory, the present study intends to explore the aftermath of internal whistleblowing and the behavioral outcomes that follow by linking it to the literature on workplace ostracism, loneliness and intentions to quit.Design/methodology/approachThe respondents were hotel employees in the Delhi NCR region of northern India. A hypothesized sequential mediation model was tested on a sample of employees from a hotel using a three-wave time-lagged multistudy design.FindingsThe findings of the study established that internal whistleblowing leads to intentions to quit via workplace ostracism and loneliness at work.Originality/valueThe unique contribution of this study lies in understanding the underlying mechanisms and discussing the behavioral outcomes that follow post-whistleblowing. HR managers need to develop a work environment that protects whistleblowers and has a zero-tolerance policy against employees engaging in any form of retaliation or unethical business practices. Managers must be more proactive and sensitive to the social cues that will make them aware of the presence of acts of ostracism. Upon encountering such acts, managers can consider counseling employees engaging in such unhealthy practices.

show abstract

Unlocking whistleblower protection: legal basis to be aware of

Абдулкерім-Османович,

Казіч-Закар

2024

Pravo bezpeka

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hardly any negative social phenomenon is as specific as corruption, which creates an intriguing paradox in law. In particular, there is no phenomenon that is mentioned more often on a daily basis, even in colloquial speech, than corruption; there is no group of criminal offences (corruption) that the whole society knows more about; there is no legal topic on which legal scholars and practitioners are more in agreement on the criminal law consequences that corruption creates and are not willing to prevent it by creating various models of its prevention; and, again, many countries are constantly failing in the fight against it. Many people improve their perception of corruption only as the situation worsens. This paradox gives rise to a vision of corruption as an intractable, powerful giant, present since ancient times, with obvious obstacles that cannot be removed even in the most developed countries. Against this backdrop, it is important to ask, and this article attempts to answer, what role whistleblowers can play in the fight against corruption and whether their more effective protection can play an important role in protecting society from corruption. This study explores the recognition of whistleblowers' importance in these efforts, including the basis and nature of their legislative protection, through a legal analysis of selected regional and international legal sources that directly or indirectly refer to whistleblowers and their protection. The analysis shows that most of these sources indicate the importance of achieving the three whistleblower protection mechanisms. To achieve the above goals, regulatory and descriptive legal methods will be used.

show abstract

Evaluating the effectiveness of whistleblower protection: A new index

Cited by 5 publications

References 25 publications

Whistleblowing dan Korupsi Pada Sektor Publik: A Systematic Review

Whistleblowing dan Korupsi Pada Sektor Publik: A Systematic Review

“Is my voicing up linked to social pain I bear”: examining the correlates of internal whistleblowing

Unlocking whistleblower protection: legal basis to be aware of

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About