2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21123989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Impact of IMU Sensor Location and Walking Task on Accuracy of Gait Event Detection Algorithms

Abstract: There are several algorithms that use the 3D acceleration and/or rotational velocity vectors from IMU sensors to identify gait events (i.e., toe-off and heel-strike). However, a clear understanding of how sensor location and the type of walking task effect the accuracy of gait event detection algorithms is lacking. To address this knowledge gap, seven participants were recruited (4M/3F; 26.0 ± 4.0 y/o) to complete a straight walking task and obstacle navigation task while data were collected from IMUs placed o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data provided evidence that the deep learning-based model was able to derive stride-specific gait parameters. The differences between the deep learning model-based stride parameters and the marker-based stride parameters were in a similar range as a recent study that compared IMU-derived stride parameters against stride parameters obtained with a pressure sensing walkway [ 29 , 53 ] and were also in the same range as results from a study that compared IMU-derived stride parameters with stride parameters obtained with an OMC systems [ 64 ]. The mean error was lower than the mean errors reported for stance and swing time (0.011 s and 0.011 s, respectively) across elderly subjects, subjects with PD, subjects with choreatic movement disorder, and hemiparetic subjects [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These data provided evidence that the deep learning-based model was able to derive stride-specific gait parameters. The differences between the deep learning model-based stride parameters and the marker-based stride parameters were in a similar range as a recent study that compared IMU-derived stride parameters against stride parameters obtained with a pressure sensing walkway [ 29 , 53 ] and were also in the same range as results from a study that compared IMU-derived stride parameters with stride parameters obtained with an OMC systems [ 64 ]. The mean error was lower than the mean errors reported for stance and swing time (0.011 s and 0.011 s, respectively) across elderly subjects, subjects with PD, subjects with choreatic movement disorder, and hemiparetic subjects [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In order to get from abstract IMU sensor readings to clinically relevant gait parameters (i.e., from accelerations and angular velocities to stride times) [ 10 ], different algorithmic approaches have been developed in the last twenty years of clinical gait research. A recent study evaluated a cross-section of these algorithms for different sensor locations on the lower leg and foot [ 29 ]. The algorithms were categorized according to which signals were analyzed, for example, the angular velocity about the medio-lateral axis or the accelerations along vertical and antero-posterior axes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A popular choice is to use the shank angular velocity for TO and HS estimation corresponding to the minima in the sagittal plane angular velocity signal [ 17 ]. Many researchers have exploited this signal over the years for diverse subject populations [ 5 ], [ 6 ], [ 10 ], [ 15 ], [ 18 ]–[ 22 ]. Though reasonable accuracy may be achieved for the HS event (errors of less than 10 ms), its validity for the TO event has been subject to some debate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A popular choice is to use the shank angular velocity for TC and IC estimation corresponding to the minima in the sagittal-plane angular velocity signal [18]. Many researchers have exploited this signal over the years for diverse subject populations [6], [7], [11], [16], [19]- [23]. This algorithm appears to predict the IC with reasonable accuracy, but its validity for the TC event has been subject to some debate [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%