2020
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2020.1750616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the performance of climate models in reproducing the hydrological characteristics of rainfall events

Abstract: For the purpose of demonstration, this study quantified the impacts of uncertainty in the rainfall projections of the GCMs on hydrological projections. A daily watershed model, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was calibrated to the runoff observations made at the outlet of a study watershed, the Hatchet Creek watershed, located in Alachua County, FL, and all 29 GCM rainfall projections were incorporated into the calibration model. The modeling results showed that runoff projections could be largely di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, they define several classes of dry spell lengths (Table 4), based on the percentiles of dry spell length calculated using the historical period of the study. Dry spells are not to be confused with the terms dry events (Willems, 2013;Willems and Vrac, 2011) or inter-events (Sørup et al, 2017;Thorndahl et al, 2017) used in the statistical downscaling methods. This is due to the definition of dry spells comprising consecutive dry days (≥ 2 d).…”
Section: Research Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, they define several classes of dry spell lengths (Table 4), based on the percentiles of dry spell length calculated using the historical period of the study. Dry spells are not to be confused with the terms dry events (Willems, 2013;Willems and Vrac, 2011) or inter-events (Sørup et al, 2017;Thorndahl et al, 2017) used in the statistical downscaling methods. This is due to the definition of dry spells comprising consecutive dry days (≥ 2 d).…”
Section: Research Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under RCP 8.5, for instance, the best GCM projected the overall rainfall depth and intensity to decrease by 10% in the 2030s and 20% in the 2070s, while the median of the GCM projections predicted the frequency to decrease by 20% and the intensity to increase by more than 30% in both the future periods. Such results demonstrate that we may reach opposite conclusions about future rainfall depending on the selection of GCM projection, which necessitates a comprehensive and detailed investigation of GCM projection accuracy in the hydrologic analysis of climate change (Her et al, 2019;Knutti et al, 2010;Song et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Studies show that not all GCMs could reproduce the characteristics of local weather variables of interest including the depths, intensities, frequencies, and pause periods of rainfall events (Hidalgo & Alfaro, 2015; Murawski et al, 2016; Song et al, 2020). It is often desirable to have a single representative future projection in a climate change study for the brevity of analysis and documentation, while the use of multiple GCM projections enables the quantification of uncertainty.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because of large uncertainties associated with climate projections, for estimating site-specific precipitation, regenerated or projected rainfall data is recommended to be supplemented with site-specific observations, particularly for sensitive structures such as nuclear facilities (Kumar et al 2013 ; Song et al 2020 ; Salimian et al 2021 ). As indicated earlier, observational data at new nuclear sites are generally limited between 10 and 15 years at the time of finalization of designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%