1978
DOI: 10.1097/00006199-197811000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Performance of Nurses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
171
0
10

Year Published

1981
1981
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
171
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Total scale Cronbach's alpha for the study sample was 0.82 -0.83. The second instrument, the Modified 6-D Scale of Nursing Performance, is a measure of quality of nursing performance that was developed by Schwirian (1978) and revised by Marshalleck (1997). It contains 61 items on a five-point Likert scale (0 = not applicable; 4 = very well) and includes seven subscales: critical care, interpersonal relations/communications, leadership, managing/outcomes, planning/evaluation, professional development, and teaching/collaboration (Cronbach's alpha for the study sample: total scale α = 0.95; subscales α = 0.71 -0.90).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total scale Cronbach's alpha for the study sample was 0.82 -0.83. The second instrument, the Modified 6-D Scale of Nursing Performance, is a measure of quality of nursing performance that was developed by Schwirian (1978) and revised by Marshalleck (1997). It contains 61 items on a five-point Likert scale (0 = not applicable; 4 = very well) and includes seven subscales: critical care, interpersonal relations/communications, leadership, managing/outcomes, planning/evaluation, professional development, and teaching/collaboration (Cronbach's alpha for the study sample: total scale α = 0.95; subscales α = 0.71 -0.90).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire was designed in the years 1974-1977 by P. Schwirian. The intention of the researcher was an assessment of the performance of nursing graduates and nurses with the period of employment up to 2 years [2]. To-date, the SDNS has been applied not only to assess performance of the graduates of nursing, but also those with long-term professional experience.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formerly, the instrument Six Dimension Scale of Nursing Performance consisted of 76 detailed criteria. The final version contains 52 detailed criteria, which have been ascribed to 6 main categories [2]: 1) leadership (5); 2) intensive / critical care (7);…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results varied with some authors reporting no difference between the internship group and a control group Ignatavicius, 1983) while others found improved performance in both selfreports by the participants in the internship and in peer reports (Blanzola et al, 2004;Clayton et al, 1989). Often performance was measured using the Schwirian Six-Dimension Scale of Nursing Performance, which is comprised of subscales measuring leadership, teaching/ collaboration, planning, interpersonal relationships/ communication, professional development and critical care (Schwirian, 1978). Using this scale, the aspects of nursing performance influenced by the interventions also vary.…”
Section: Interventions Supporting Newly Graduated Nursesmentioning
confidence: 99%