2015
DOI: 10.1038/srep18364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the potential impact of proton carriers on syntrophic propionate oxidation

Abstract: Anaerobic propionic acid degradation relies on interspecies electron transfer (IET) between propionate oxidisers and electron acceptor microorganisms, via either molecular hydrogen, formate or direct transfers. We evaluated the possibility of stimulating direct IET, hence enhancing propionate oxidation, by increasing availability of proton carriers to decrease solution resistance and reduce pH gradients. Phosphate was used as a proton carrying anion, and chloride as control ion together with potassium as count… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A literature survey (Supplementary Table S2, Supplementary Material A) provides first hints on which of the taxa might be responsible for VFA oxidation and which ones might be responsible for degradation of dead microbial biomass. Cloacimonetes (Pelletier et al, 2008; Juste-Poinapen et al, 2015; Ahlert et al, 2016), Cryptanaerobacter (de Bok et al, 2005), and Desulfovibrio (Suzuki et al, 2010) have been connected with propionic or butyric acid oxidation but no co-culture of one of their species with a hydrogenotrophic methanogen has been tested yet. Candidatus Cloacamonas acidaminovorans, for example, contains all genes for propionic acid oxidation via methylmalonyl-CoA but has not been isolated yet (Pelletier et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A literature survey (Supplementary Table S2, Supplementary Material A) provides first hints on which of the taxa might be responsible for VFA oxidation and which ones might be responsible for degradation of dead microbial biomass. Cloacimonetes (Pelletier et al, 2008; Juste-Poinapen et al, 2015; Ahlert et al, 2016), Cryptanaerobacter (de Bok et al, 2005), and Desulfovibrio (Suzuki et al, 2010) have been connected with propionic or butyric acid oxidation but no co-culture of one of their species with a hydrogenotrophic methanogen has been tested yet. Candidatus Cloacamonas acidaminovorans, for example, contains all genes for propionic acid oxidation via methylmalonyl-CoA but has not been isolated yet (Pelletier et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DIET in syntrophic methanogenic cultures, that is solely based on biological electrical connections, has been documented in co-cultures of Geobacter species [ 11 , 12 ] as well as in co-cultures of Geobacter metallireducens with Methanosaeta harundinacea [ 13 ] or Methanosarcina barkeri [ 14 ] and in co-cultures of Geobacter hydrogenophilus and Methanosarcina barkeri [ 15 ]. DIET based on biological connections has been documented also in anaerobic granules and methanogenic wastewater digester aggregates [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on the gene content of Pr01, a possible explanation for this finding could be ascribed to the quinone-mediated interspecies electron transfer. It is well known that the interspecies electron transfer is a fundamental feature in syntrophic communities between anaerobic bacteria and archaea 33 34 . To maintain the redox reactions of LCFA degradation at sufficiently exergonic levels, syntrophic bacteria deposit electrons onto hydrogen, which will be in turn utilized by methanogens to produce methane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%