2015
DOI: 10.1007/s13595-015-0532-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the productivity of four main tree species in Germany under climate change with static reduced models

Abstract: & Key messageWe present simple models of forest net primary production (NPP) in Germany that show increasing productivity, especially in mountainous areas, under warming unless water becomes a limiting factor.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such phenomenon has been already observed in South Tyrol [16]. Interestingly, some forest stands reported also NDII7 increase, which could be supported by findings of [74].…”
Section: Meteorological Drought Conditions and Forest Temporal Responsesupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such phenomenon has been already observed in South Tyrol [16]. Interestingly, some forest stands reported also NDII7 increase, which could be supported by findings of [74].…”
Section: Meteorological Drought Conditions and Forest Temporal Responsesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Short-lived GPP and CF increases observed in 2003 are in line with [27] and could be explained not only by the earlier SBD and longer SL, but also intensified vegetation growth at higher altitudes, which is normally constrained by the temperature gradient [73,75]. Extended dryness led however to divergence in CF values within both impact classes, which can be related to site-specific differences and environmental conditions such as soil structure, and forest species distribution [28,33,74,76]. Although areas showing depleted NDII7 (class 3) were mostly detected in the Vinschgau Valley, which is the driest region of South Tyrol, expected higher drought adjustment of trees shown by [77] was not observed.…”
Section: Alpine Forestmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Even though uncertainties in model parametrization for all species and the uncertainties in model structure contribute to partly insufficient results (Medlyn et al, 2005b) we argue that it is encouraging to see how well 4C performs overall across these very different sites. In agreement with other recent studies with 4C (Borys et al, 2016;Gutsch et al, 2015a;Gutsch et al, 2016), this study underlines the applicability of 4C to its main research areas: (1) studies on climate impacts on managed forest ecosystems, (2) trade-off studies on forest-based ecosystem services, (3) studies on forest management strategies and risk analysis, (4) carbon accounting of forest-based bioenergy, and (5) studies on understanding the underlying functioning of forest ecosystems.…”
Section: Applicability and Reliability Of 4csupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Future studies could combine both the economic consequences of species diversification and changes in rotation age (see for example Messerer et al (2017) for a methodological example). Recent studies also suggest an increase in growth performance of spruce under climate change (Gutsch et al 2016;Thiele et al 2017), while larger scale species distribution models have anticipated a long-term shift from coniferous to broad-leaved species (Dyderski et al 2017). We disregarded growth responses to climate variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%