Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering 2017
DOI: 10.5220/0006369403080313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Quality of the Documentation of Open Source Software

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These documents play a crucial role in the software development process by offering extensive guidance to developers. They assist in the utilization of software components and their seamless integration into applications, thereby addressing various functional requirements and maintenance activities (Aversano et al, 2017). API (Application Programming Interface) references and SDK (Software Development Kit) documentation are the two most common developer documentation in China.…”
Section: Developer Documentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These documents play a crucial role in the software development process by offering extensive guidance to developers. They assist in the utilization of software components and their seamless integration into applications, thereby addressing various functional requirements and maintenance activities (Aversano et al, 2017). API (Application Programming Interface) references and SDK (Software Development Kit) documentation are the two most common developer documentation in China.…”
Section: Developer Documentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on documentation quality from the perspective of users, namely the developers, has been limited. The research focuses of previous studies on developer documentation were limited to automatic assessment tools (Dautovic et al, 2011), metrics-based evaluating models (Aversano et al, 2017), and expert opinions (Garousi et al, 2013). Developers' participation was rarely discussed in such studies.…”
Section: Implications and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%