2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the role of active management in mature Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) stands for songbird conservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The retention harvest management condition examined in this study is an example of the latter strategy. The results from this study and Williams et al (2021), and findings elsewhere (e.g., Hansen & Hounihan, 1996;Odsen et al, 2018;Rosenvald & Lõhmus, 2008;Shea et al, 2017), suggest that structural retention may, to some extent, defray trade-offs between conservation of late-successional and early-successional forest birds.…”
Section: Trade-offs Between Late-successional Forest Birds and Early-...supporting
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The retention harvest management condition examined in this study is an example of the latter strategy. The results from this study and Williams et al (2021), and findings elsewhere (e.g., Hansen & Hounihan, 1996;Odsen et al, 2018;Rosenvald & Lõhmus, 2008;Shea et al, 2017), suggest that structural retention may, to some extent, defray trade-offs between conservation of late-successional and early-successional forest birds.…”
Section: Trade-offs Between Late-successional Forest Birds and Early-...supporting
confidence: 71%
“…Some formal trade‐off analyses have detected similar congruence between these two forest management objectives (e.g., Carpentier et al, 2017; Fürstenau et al, 2007; Heinonen et al, 2017; Triviño et al, 2017), but it is notable that many of these analyses assume an equivalence between biodiversity and late‐successional biodiversity, using elements of forest structure that are typically maximized in late‐successional forests as proxies for biodiversity. Our findings indicate that forest structures providing lower relative carbon benefits (such as the retention harvest stands in our sample) may also yield substantial biodiversity benefits (Williams, 2019; also see Hagar, 2007; Swanson et al, 2011, 2014), resulting in high biodiversity–carbon storage trade‐offs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations