Migration of Organisms
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-26604-6_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the roles of connectivity and environment on faunal turnover: patterns in recent and fossil Iberian mammals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Factors influencing species turnover among local faunas are usually a combination of both environmental and geographical variables (Borcard et al ., 1992) and determining their relative weighting is crucial for understanding the shaping of biogeographic patterns (Duivenvoorden et al ., 2002; Genner et al ., 2004; Hortal et al ., 2005). In the present study, geographical variation of assemblages yields two well‐defined areas of Eurosiberian and Mediterranean influence respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Factors influencing species turnover among local faunas are usually a combination of both environmental and geographical variables (Borcard et al ., 1992) and determining their relative weighting is crucial for understanding the shaping of biogeographic patterns (Duivenvoorden et al ., 2002; Genner et al ., 2004; Hortal et al ., 2005). In the present study, geographical variation of assemblages yields two well‐defined areas of Eurosiberian and Mediterranean influence respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have recognised the contribution to assemblage dissimilarity made by geographic distance, which explains more variation in faunistic dissimilarity than does environment (Duivenvoorden et al ., 2002; Tuomisto et al ., 2003; Genner et al ., 2004; Qian et al ., 2005). Area connectedness (Hortal et al ., 2005) and its interplay with demographic factors and colonisation possibilities probably make distance variables relevant, since environmental variable weight is highly dependent on the dispersal capabilities of each taxonomic group (Araujo & Pearson, 2005). These findings highlight the role of historical factors, and particularly species dispersion capacity, in the shaping of assemblage structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors will increase the decay of species similarity with geographical distance (GD), but their effects will depend on spatial configuration of the suitable habitats and on the dispersal capacity of the species. Habitat patchiness promotes assemblages differentiation through extinction-colonisation, with its effect modulated by the degree of suitability of the matrix and the presence of corridors (Nekola & White, 1999;Hortal et al, 2005;Vanschoenwinkel et al, 2007). Nevertheless, in the long term, it is the dispersal capacity of taxa what determines the ability to reach environmentally suitable places.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%