2011
DOI: 10.1136/jnis.2011.004879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous acetabuloplasty

Abstract: Percutaneous acetabuloplasty appears to be safe and effective for improving the pain and decreased mobility secondary to metastatic lesions of the acetabulum.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cement acetabuloplasty has been reported to be a safe and successful procedure for periacetabular carcinoma metastases [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]14]. The largest series to date describes this procedure in 25 patients and measures functional outcome using an array of measures such as the Harris Hip Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Arthritis Index (WOMAC), ECOG performance status, and VAS for pain [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cement acetabuloplasty has been reported to be a safe and successful procedure for periacetabular carcinoma metastases [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]14]. The largest series to date describes this procedure in 25 patients and measures functional outcome using an array of measures such as the Harris Hip Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Arthritis Index (WOMAC), ECOG performance status, and VAS for pain [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Finally, a Cox regression analysis was performed for the entire study group to identify independent predictors of poor survival. We included previously investigated [2,[13][14][15][16] and additional variables which may affect survival in this clinical setting (Table 3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both the FMS and the AS have been described in the evaluation of cement augmentation procedures. 13 Formal, documented VAS, FMS, and AS evaluations became routine during the study period and were performed between January 2007 and September 2013. A 4-level pain scale was also used to evaluate patient response to the procedure (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue features an article on percutaneous acetabuloplasty 1. The authors of this manuscript are an experienced group of neurointerventionalists who have done extensive work in vertebral augmentation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%