2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the safety impacts of the number and arrangement of lanes on freeway exit ramps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
43
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
8
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In every group, there is a significant increase in both total and FI crashes, with an increase in AADT, as more crashes always occur at high traffic volumes, as in congested situations. This is consistent with other studies (e.g., Pilko et al, 2007;Chen, et al, 2009). There is also an increase in crashes with the increase of the inside (left) shoulder width.…”
Section: Data and Modelssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In every group, there is a significant increase in both total and FI crashes, with an increase in AADT, as more crashes always occur at high traffic volumes, as in congested situations. This is consistent with other studies (e.g., Pilko et al, 2007;Chen, et al, 2009). There is also an increase in crashes with the increase of the inside (left) shoulder width.…”
Section: Data and Modelssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In previous studies, a section with 457.5 m (1500 ft) in the upstream and 304.8 m (1000 ft) in the downstream was considered as the influencing area of an exit ramp (Chen et al, 2009;Liu et al, 2010). On the Guangshen freeway, the message signs for exits are usually posted 500 m upstream of the exits.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of the previous crash prediction models, crash counts were usually aggregated over several years and the average crash count per year was considered the response variable (Bauer and Harwood, 1998;Bared et al, 1999;McCartt et al, 2004;Chen et al, 2009;Lord and Mannering, 2010;Liu et al, 2010;Washington et al, 2010). The reason for this is to reduce the random variation in the yearly crash data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the studies above, there were also researches on diverging segments' safety. Some researchers explored the contributing factors to crashes at freeway diverging locations [7][8], they discovered that AADT, lane-type configuration and speed are always tend to increase the severity of crashes at freeway diverging areas. The operating speed of diverging segments were also been studied [9][10], and linear regression model were adopted to predict the speed of diverging area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%