2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/4971765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Solar Slowly Varying Component at C-Band Using Dual- and Single-Polarization Weather Radars in Europe

Abstract: Six C-band weather radars located in Europe (Finland, Netherlands, and Switzerland) have been used to monitor the slowly varying solar emission, which is an oscillation with an amplitude of several decibels and a period of approximately 27 days. It is caused by the fact that the number of active regions that enhance the solar radio emission with respect to the quiet component, as seen from Earth, varies because of the Sun's rotation about its axis. The analysis is based on solar signals contained in the polar … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is partly compensated for by the fact that only one estimate out of many daily hits is retrieved. In Reference [11] ( Table 4), the standard deviation of the daily differential reflectivity during an active solar period in 2014 was 0.06 dB for Monte Lema (220 days) and 0.05 dB for the Albis radar (204 days); the dispersion of the difference between H and V during the same set of 100 days in 2014 was 0.06 dB for Albis and 0.08 dB for the Finish ANJ radar (see Table 3 in Reference [22]). In a recent manuscript that reviews several aspects of the monitoring of dual-polarization receiver using solar hits found in operational scans [12], a dispersion as low as 0.02 dB was found for ANJ.…”
Section: Differential (Horizontal/vertical) Radar Reflectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is partly compensated for by the fact that only one estimate out of many daily hits is retrieved. In Reference [11] ( Table 4), the standard deviation of the daily differential reflectivity during an active solar period in 2014 was 0.06 dB for Monte Lema (220 days) and 0.05 dB for the Albis radar (204 days); the dispersion of the difference between H and V during the same set of 100 days in 2014 was 0.06 dB for Albis and 0.08 dB for the Finish ANJ radar (see Table 3 in Reference [22]). In a recent manuscript that reviews several aspects of the monitoring of dual-polarization receiver using solar hits found in operational scans [12], a dispersion as low as 0.02 dB was found for ANJ.…”
Section: Differential (Horizontal/vertical) Radar Reflectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Albis (7 values), the standard deviation is as small as˘0.04 dB. It is interesting to compare this very small dispersion of the difference between H and V with the one obtained using the operational method [2][3][4] for daily monitoring: during 220 (204) days in 2014, it was˘0.05 (˘0.06) dB, as can be seen in Table 4 in [4]; during the same set of 100 days in 2014, the dispersion of the difference between H and V was 0.06 dB for Albis and 0.08 dB for ANJ (see Table 3 in [5]). In a recent manuscript that reviews several aspects of the monitoring of dual-polarization receiver using solar hits found in operational scans [15], a dispersion as low as 0.02 dB was found for the Finnish ANJ and LUO radar.…”
Section: Summary Conclusion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Using such a different technique for more than two hundred days in 2014, the standard deviation of the error of the horizontal channel of Albis (Monte Lema) was, as expected, much larger than with this Sun-tracking method:˘0.35 (˘0.48) dB (see Table 2 in [4]). By restricting the analysis to 100 days (see Table 4 in [5]), the standard deviation of the error results is smaller:˘0.26 (˘0.34) dB for Albis (Monte Lema), which is still considerably larger than with the Sun-tracking method. Similar results are obtained if we consider other C-band radar receivers in Europe: for the same 100-day period, the standard deviation of the error was˘0.26 dB for the Dutch Den Helder radar and˘0.36 dB for the Finnish Anjalankoski (ANJ) radar.…”
Section: Summary Conclusion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation