2011
DOI: 10.13031/2013.40671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the SWAT Model for a Low-Gradient Forested Watershed in Coastal South Carolina

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Modeling the hydrology of low-gradient forested watersheds on shallow, poorly drained soils of the coastal plain is a challenging task due to complexities in watershed delineation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four iterations of 500 simulations each for the two basins were run using years 2007 and 2008 as the calibration years. The calibration period was similar to other studies that have implemented SWAT within the Coastal Plains [14,19,20]. The calibrated values from the fourth iteration were used in the validation iteration of 500 simulations for years 2010 and 2011.…”
Section: Swat Model Simulations and Swat-cup Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four iterations of 500 simulations each for the two basins were run using years 2007 and 2008 as the calibration years. The calibration period was similar to other studies that have implemented SWAT within the Coastal Plains [14,19,20]. The calibrated values from the fourth iteration were used in the validation iteration of 500 simulations for years 2010 and 2011.…”
Section: Swat Model Simulations and Swat-cup Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of SWAT in low-gradient regions with extensive groundwater-surface water interactions, such as the southeastern U.S. Coastal Plain, has increased in recent years, but it remains an underdeveloped area of study. Models in this region have resulted in varying degrees of accuracy in predicting hydrologic processes such as streamflow [3,4,[14][15][16][17][18][19], runoff [4,14,20], and potential and/or actual evapotranspiration rates [4,18]. Difficulties specifically associated with modeling Coastal Plain watersheds arise due to the flat topography, extensive groundwater-surface water interactions, as well as the seasonal variations and physical and temporal heterogeneity in precipitation and evapotranspiration rates within these environments [3,4,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a vast majority of watersheds (approximately 30 inland watersheds), the models showed R 2 = [0.45, 0.68], NRMSE = [0.07, 0.1], and WI = [0.45, 0.68] for the calibration and validation datasets at daily time step, respectively. The performance of the models for the rest of the SAG region was assessed to be satisfactory based on the findings of several other studies conducted in various parts of the SEUS, such as Virginia [58], the coastal plain of southwestern Georgia [97], low-gradient watersheds in South Carolina [98], etc.…”
Section: Streamflow Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As currently defined the 3 rd order (1:24,000 scale) system at the gauging station, "Turkey Creek" (WS 78) is located within the USGS quadrangle maps of Huger (NE), Bethera (SE), Shulerville (SW and SE), and Ocean Bay (NW and NE) at 33˚08'N latitude and 79˚47'W longitude (approximate coordinate ranges of 610,400 to 628,600 easting and 3,658,500 to 3,670,500 northing [30]) in Berkeley County about 60 km northeast of the City of Charleston, South Carolina (SC), USA (Figure 1). Located within a 4 th level 8-digit hydrologic unit code (HUC 03050201) of the Cooper River sub-basin [28], watershed WS 78 is at the headwaters of East Cooper River, a major tributary of the Cooper River draining to the Charleston Harbor System [31].…”
Section: Watershed Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%