Evaluating the uncertainty of Landsat-derived vegetation indices in quantifying forest fuel treatments using bi-temporal LiDAR data

Abstract

A B S T R A C TForest ecosystems in the American west have long been influenced by timber harvests and fire suppression, and recently through treatments that reduce fuel for fire management. Precisely quantifying the structural changes to forests caused by fuel treatments is an essential step to evaluate their impacts. Satellite imagery-derived vegetation indices, such as the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), have been widely used to map forest dynamics. However, uncertainties in using these vegetation indices to quantify forest structural changes have not been thoroughly studied, mainly due to the lack of wall-to-wall validation data. In this study we generated forest structural changes in aboveground biomass (AGB) and canopy cover as a result of fuel treatments using bitemporal airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data and field measurements in a mixed coniferous forest of northern Sierra Nevada, California, USA. These LiDAR-derived forest structural measures were used to evaluate the uncertainties of using Landsat-derived vegetation indices to quantify treatments. Our results confirmed that vegetation indices can accurately map the extents of forest disturbance and canopy cover changes caused by fuel treatments, but the accuracy in quantifying AGB changes varied by the pre-treatment forest densities and treatment intensity. Changes in vegetation indices had relatively weaker correlations (coefficient of determination < 0.45) to biomass changes in forests with sparse (AGB < 100 Mg/ha) or dense biomass (AGB > 700 Mg/ha), than in forests with moderate-density (AGB between 100 Mg/ha and 700 Mg/ha) before the disturbances. Moreover, understory treatments (canopy height < 10 m) were poorly indicated by changes in satellite-derived vegetation indices. Our results suggest that when relating vegetation indices to AGB changes, researchers and managers should be cautious about their uncertainties in extremely dense or sparse forests, particularly when treatments mainly removed small trees or understory fuels. Tempel et al., 2014). Because these management practices are so impactful on forest structure, accurate measurement of the changes to forest structure as a result of fuel treatments is necessary, but doing so remains challenging. Accurate and timely quantification of forest changes in abundance, production, and spatial pattern is a necessary step for forest fuel treatment evaluation (Huang et al., 2009;Su et al., 2016a). Traditional (M. Kelly).Ecological Indicators 95 (2018) 298-310 1470-160X/

Examining Forest Structure With Terrestrial Lidar: Suggestions and Novel Techniques Based on Comparisons Between Scanners and Forest Treatments

“…Combined, these stressors are straining forest management and resources, and large‐scale, spatially explicit descriptions of forest structure, condition, and change are necessary (Boisvenue et al, ; Dale et al, ; Dassot et al, ). Lidar has been identified as one of the best ways to understand and assess forest carbon balance, forest structure, and disturbance (Hudak et al, ; Ma et al, ; Mitchard, ).…”

“…Changes in climate combined with altered forest structure and ecological function have led to increased frequency, size, and severity of wildfires, especially throughout western North America (Miller et al, 2008;Stephens et al, 2013; scale, spatially explicit descriptions of forest structure, condition, and change are necessary (Boisvenue et al, 2016;Dale et al, 1998;Dassot et al, 2011). Lidar has been identified as one of the best ways to understand and assess forest carbon balance, forest structure, and disturbance (Hudak et al, 2012;Ma et al, 2018;Mitchard, 2018).…”

“…In forested landscapes, passive spectral reflectance information from remote sensing data sets is commonly used to classify and quantify land‐use/land‐cover types, forest canopy cover, and landscape ecology metrics but is largely unable to assess vertical and “below canopy” forest structure such as tree heights, height to the crown (HTC), tree DBH, or overall tree density without ground‐based measurements and indirect estimation and modeling (Hyde et al, ; Hyyppä et al, ; Ma et al, ; Roberts et al, ; Van Leeuwen & Nieuwenhuis, ; Wulder et al, ). Lidar is an active means of collecting 3‐D remote sensing data and provides a means of measuring and modeling both vertical and horizontal forest structure.…”

Remotely Sensed Water Limitation in Vegetation: Insights from an Experiment with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)

“…First, NDVI saturates in areas with dense canopy cover (at high leaf area index (LAI) values) [21,33,34]. Additionally, the relationship between NDVI and vegetation in sparsely vegetated areas is influenced largely by variations in soil reflectance [35], which means that a focus on NDVI under these conditions can have large uncertainties [26,36].…”

Xf-Rovim. A Field Robot to Detect Olive Trees Infected by Xylella Fastidiosa Using Proximal Sensing

“…Therefore, by crossing the entire plant with the sensor, geometric parameters such as height, width, volume and other structural parameters of the canopy can be estimated [10]. Moreover, the laser pulses emitted by the LiDAR sensor can penetrate through the canopy and, thus, the effects of shading or saturation are reduced [11,12].…”