2001
DOI: 10.1378/chest.119.4.1166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Validity of Responsiveness to Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Pediatric Patients With ARDS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In older children and adults with AHRF, iNO improves PaO 2 and reduces pulmonary artery pressure in the acute phase of its application, if only temporarily [62,107,[114][115][116]. However, it is not a part of standard therapy in this population because clinical reports suggest that it does not increase survival rates or the number of ventilator-free days, nor does it reduce the need for ECMO [117].…”
Section: Inhaled Vasodilatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In older children and adults with AHRF, iNO improves PaO 2 and reduces pulmonary artery pressure in the acute phase of its application, if only temporarily [62,107,[114][115][116]. However, it is not a part of standard therapy in this population because clinical reports suggest that it does not increase survival rates or the number of ventilator-free days, nor does it reduce the need for ECMO [117].…”
Section: Inhaled Vasodilatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As multiple therapies are simultaneously instituted in a critically ill patient with AHRF, it is difficult to evaluate the efficacy of iNO alone. Baldauf et al [114] evaluated 119 data points in 19 ARDS patients during the first 72 hours of iNO therapy. They found that in 42% of these data points, improvement in oxygenation was not due to iNO alone.…”
Section: Inhaled Vasodilatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%