2015
DOI: 10.1177/0954409715596192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating tie support at railway bridge transitions

Abstract: This paper compares the behavior of three different railway bridge transition zones to illustrate how poor tie support affects track performance. The three bridge transitions consist of a high-speed passenger line, a freight line, and a spur track. All bridge transitions were instrumented with accelerometers that allow tie support and track performance to be non-invasively evaluated by analyzing the measured acceleration magnitudes and vibration frequencies in the frequency domain. The results show tracks with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to mechanical loading and performance aspects, such as the structural rigidity and contact force below crosstie, dynamic behavior trends including vibration velocity and acceleration are used for track evaluation. Excessive vibrations usually indicate undesired track conditions such as the effects of a hanging crosstie, ballast non-uniform support conditions, or ballast fouling ( 16, 3135 ). Investigating crosstie vibration velocity can bring insights on the implications of ballast degradation to track performance.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to mechanical loading and performance aspects, such as the structural rigidity and contact force below crosstie, dynamic behavior trends including vibration velocity and acceleration are used for track evaluation. Excessive vibrations usually indicate undesired track conditions such as the effects of a hanging crosstie, ballast non-uniform support conditions, or ballast fouling ( 16, 3135 ). Investigating crosstie vibration velocity can bring insights on the implications of ballast degradation to track performance.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pivoting generates an increase in impact loading on the ballast, which increases ballast degradation. 5,24,2931 As a consequence, the track deteriorates and continuing maintenance is required.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change was found to be related to the rough site areas that exhibited settlement-related track geometry variability because of fouled ballast. In these areas, the effect of fouled ballast was manifested through tie settlement or the development of tie-ballast gaps that can lead to load redistribution in the track structure (11). The contact deflection was found to not significantly differ between the rough and smooth site (Figure 2 and Table 1).…”
Section: Track Load-deflection Behaviormentioning
confidence: 98%