2020
DOI: 10.1111/aje.12724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating veld condition index: How many samples are enough?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst postgraduate students normally first-author their contributions in professional (non-undergraduate) Improving real-world impact from research-focused experiential learning in higher education: A call -to-arms and a case study from field ecology journals as guided by their supervisors, and co-authorship of scientific articles in professional journals by undergraduate students occurs, it is not always explicit and may replace transparency regarding student participation in methods sections (i.e., an either/or approach). For example, a project on tools for quantifying biodiversity and assessing management outcomes in a South-African savannah ecosystem yielded three publications that included undergraduate students as co-authors but did not explicitly refer to this anywhere in the manuscript (Goodenough et al, 2017(Goodenough et al, , 2020Hart et al, 2020). It also yielded two publications that clearly described the inclusion of 50 undergraduate students in the methods section but did not include any of them as co-authors and did not list their names in the acknowledgements (Goodenough et al, 2018a(Goodenough et al, , 2018b.…”
Section: Barriers To Real-world Impact and Visibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst postgraduate students normally first-author their contributions in professional (non-undergraduate) Improving real-world impact from research-focused experiential learning in higher education: A call -to-arms and a case study from field ecology journals as guided by their supervisors, and co-authorship of scientific articles in professional journals by undergraduate students occurs, it is not always explicit and may replace transparency regarding student participation in methods sections (i.e., an either/or approach). For example, a project on tools for quantifying biodiversity and assessing management outcomes in a South-African savannah ecosystem yielded three publications that included undergraduate students as co-authors but did not explicitly refer to this anywhere in the manuscript (Goodenough et al, 2017(Goodenough et al, , 2020Hart et al, 2020). It also yielded two publications that clearly described the inclusion of 50 undergraduate students in the methods section but did not include any of them as co-authors and did not list their names in the acknowledgements (Goodenough et al, 2018a(Goodenough et al, , 2018b.…”
Section: Barriers To Real-world Impact and Visibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Management decisions, including whether to translocate, introduce or cull certain species, rely on accurate survey data whilst conservation strategies are fundamentally determined by the knowledge of which species are present (Goodenough and Hart 2017). There has been considerable research to develop and refine ecological surveying methods, including consideration of optimal sample sizes (Stockwell and Peterson 2002;Hart et al 2020), spatial coverage (Rees et al 2011;Einoder et al 2018), study duration (Mackenzie and Royle 2005;Halstead et al 2021) and inter-observer variation (Cherrill and McClean 1999;Kolada et al 2014;Goodenough et al 2020). There has also been extensive development of the technology used in ecological surveying, including remote sensing (Pettorelli et al 2014), tracking movement of animals using GPS (Seidel et al 2018) or light-logger geolocators (McKinnon et al 2013), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) (Sun et al 2017), thermal imaging (Goodenough et al 2018), passive audio detection (Sugai et al 2019), and camera trapping (Delisle et el.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%