Evaluating Water Use Efficiency in China’s Western Provinces Based on a Slacks-Based Measure (SBM)-Undesirable Window Model and a Malmquist Productivity Index

Abstract

This paper evaluated the water use efficiency in 12 Chinese western provinces from 2005 to 2015. Based on data availability and the index selection rationality and the slacks-based measure (SBM)-undesirable Window analysis model and the Malmquist productivity index, the water resource inputs and outputs were measured to analyze water use efficiency. Total investment in fixed assets for the whole society and total water, made up of total agricultural water, total industrial water, and total domestic water, were used as the input indexes, and regional GDP and waste water discharge were the output indexes, with the waste water discharge being regarded as an undesirable output. The data from different years and different provinces in the same period, and data from the same year and the same provinces in different periods were compared in order to derive the water resource efficiency and technical changes over time and space. It was found that the total water resource factor productivity in the 12 provinces grew slowly in the study period, that water resource technical progress positively affected water use efficiency, and that a lack of technical efficiency restricted water use efficiency growth. Several suggestions are given to optimize water use efficiency in the 12 provinces. The research findings and suggestions provide valuable reference for studies in related fields.

Spatiotemporal Evolution of the Green Efficiency of Industrial Water Resources and Its Influencing Factors in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River of China

“…It compares the relative efficiency between decisionmaking units, and evaluates decision-making units [25][26]. The SBM-DEA model improves on traditional DEA models that do not take enough ac-count of the slackness of data inputs and outputs in the calculation process [27]. Therefore, this paper adopts SBM model that can solve the problem of input slack to measure the GEIWR [28].…”

Impact of “Three Red Lines” Water Policy (2011) on Water Usage Efficiency, Production Technology Heterogeneity, and Determinant of Water Productivity Change in China

“…This research indicates that WST may affect productivity increases in total factor productivity. Further, numerous studies gauge the impact of technology and technical efficiency on water and environmental TFP growth [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ]. Our study investigates the impact of the Chinese government’s three red line water security policy on water usage TFP and explores its determinant (technology or efficiency).…”

The effectiveness of a water resource tax policy in improving water-use efficiency: a quasi-natural experiment-based approach

“…As a vital comprehensive index reflecting the effective development, utilization and management of water resources, the improvement in the water resource utilization efficiency (WRUE) is important to alleviate the issues of the water crisis in China (Chang & Zhu, 2021). WRUE is the ratio of input to output of water resources and other factors, measuring the effect of human allocation of water resources and economic activities in the process of social production, which is the result of economic development, technological progress, water resource consumption and other factors, with the characteristics of multi-input, multi-output and multi-decision (Luo et al, 2018;Yang et al, 2022). There is clear theoretical and empirical evidence for several scholars that water-economic leveraging is considered the most effective way to improve the WRUE (Tortajada et al, 2019).…”