2012
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ir.1943-4774.0000362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and Comparison of Drip and Conventional Irrigation Methods on Sugar Beets in a Semiarid Region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, APRD 50 performed better than CDI 50 and yielded 11% higher white sugar (in Table 3 not given) when same amount of irrigation water was applied. The results of our study support the findings by other researchers who reported that DI plays an important role in decreasing sugar beet root and sugar yields (Uç an and Gencoglan, 2004;Kızıloglu et al, 2006;Rinaldi and Vonella, 2006;Topak et al, 2010;Ghamarnia et al, 2012).…”
Section: Root and Sugar Yieldssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, APRD 50 performed better than CDI 50 and yielded 11% higher white sugar (in Table 3 not given) when same amount of irrigation water was applied. The results of our study support the findings by other researchers who reported that DI plays an important role in decreasing sugar beet root and sugar yields (Uç an and Gencoglan, 2004;Kızıloglu et al, 2006;Rinaldi and Vonella, 2006;Topak et al, 2010;Ghamarnia et al, 2012).…”
Section: Root and Sugar Yieldssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Sahin et al [47] observed a sugar content range from 16.16% to 17.51% in irrigation treatments. Ghamarnia et al [48] obtained a sugar content ranging from 12.62% to 23.53% and proclaimed that with increasing water deficit, the sugar content increased. The results reported by Abyaneha et al [8] showed that with an increase in water stress, sugar beet crops, when faced with a water shortage, increase their sugar content.…”
Section: Sugar Beet Root Yield and Sugar Content Under The Influence mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A diferença para isso, possivelmente, está relacionada aos níveis de condutividade elétrica estudados e, principalmente, à eficiência da marcha de absorção da cultura, pois se a marcha de absorção é precisa, M1 e M2 pouco se diferenciam em níveis de condutividade elétrica aproximados. Os valores de diâmetro da raiz estudados no presente estudo foram superiores aos encontrados por GHAMARNIA et al (2012) em estudos sobre os métodos de irrigação e lâminas de água na cultura da beterraba, porém as diferentes condições e tratamentos utilizados podem ter causado tais diferenças. …”
Section: Diâmetro Do Pecíolo (Cm)unclassified