2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2019.02.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and efficiency comparison of evolutionary algorithms for service placement optimization in fog architectures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors in [17] presented a fog-based solution that offers computation and storage services for IoT applications. It aims to reduce the network latency of these applications by placing services into fog nodes close to the IoT devices.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in [17] presented a fog-based solution that offers computation and storage services for IoT applications. It aims to reduce the network latency of these applications by placing services into fog nodes close to the IoT devices.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three evolutionary algorithms for service embedding in the Fog are proposed by Guerrero et al [15], and three objectives were drawn: minimizing latency; minimizing free resources; and optimizing service spread (even distribution of services). These proposals suffer from scalability and modularity problems, like any other basic genetic algorithm [16].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the reviewed literature, some observations arise. First, simulation seems to be the main method for evaluation [13], [15], [19], [21]- [23], which is due to the complex scenario comprised by the Cloud to IoT continuum. Mathematical solutions are also broadly used, following ILP or MILP models [13], [17], [19], [22]; even though these models perform well in offline studies, they suffer from time constraints when applied to online scenarios.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations