2012
DOI: 10.5152/jtgga.2012.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and management of voiding dysfunction after midurethral sling procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 26 ] Studies have even reported that voiding disturbance is known to be transient and have been reported to resolve spontaneously as well. [ 27 ] No de novo urge incontinence was reported in our series though it has been reported in literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…[ 26 ] Studies have even reported that voiding disturbance is known to be transient and have been reported to resolve spontaneously as well. [ 27 ] No de novo urge incontinence was reported in our series though it has been reported in literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Chronic urinary retention from urethral obstruction may be corrected by urethrolysis or treated with lifelong intermittent catheterization. After MUS procedures, surgical release for refractory postoperative VD procedures has been indicated for 1-2% of women [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method used for the voiding trial just after catheter removal can influence the incidence of VD. Furthermore, intervention methods such as indwelling bladder catheterization or intermittent catheterization for retention affect the recovery period [ 19 ]. In one study, urinary retention was acknowledged when catheterization lasted at least 4 weeks, whereas in another study this parameter was at least 1 day [ 20 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study, urinary retention was acknowledged when catheterization lasted at least 4 weeks, whereas in another study this parameter was at least 1 day [ 20 21 ]. In the present study, significant PVR was considered to be a PVR of more than 50% of voided volume, whereas others have adopted a cutoff of 100 mL PVR [ 19 ]. It is also debated whether to catheterize for obstructive voiding symptoms or not [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%