2004
DOI: 10.2172/15007928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and Recommendation of Waste Form and Packaging for Disposition of the K East Basin North Loadout Pit Sludge

Abstract: This report discusses an evaluation and recommendations on waste forms and packaging configurations considered for disposition of the sludge accumulated in the Hanford K East (KE) Basin North Loadout Pit (NLOP). The final disposition of the waste will be as contact-handled transuranic waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in New Mexico. These recommendations were supported in part by characterization and testing results performed on a sample of the KE NLOP sludge collected by Fluor Hanford and provided to P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All three "KE NLOP" samples have significant sludge volumes in the respective jars and thus were measured with good precision. Therefore their varied settled density values reflect heterogeneity of this sludge material, which is known to be rich in rapidly settling quartz sand and also contain a much slower settling fine fraction that is, overall, low in uranium concentration (Mellinger et al 2004;Delegard et al 2011). In the case of "KC-4-2" sludge the density data scatter for the X-jar and Y-jar replicates is predominantly associated with uneven splitting of the original sample to produce 142 ml and 14 ml of the settled sludge, respectively.…”
Section: Sludge Bulk Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All three "KE NLOP" samples have significant sludge volumes in the respective jars and thus were measured with good precision. Therefore their varied settled density values reflect heterogeneity of this sludge material, which is known to be rich in rapidly settling quartz sand and also contain a much slower settling fine fraction that is, overall, low in uranium concentration (Mellinger et al 2004;Delegard et al 2011). In the case of "KC-4-2" sludge the density data scatter for the X-jar and Y-jar replicates is predominantly associated with uneven splitting of the original sample to produce 142 ml and 14 ml of the settled sludge, respectively.…”
Section: Sludge Bulk Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Size-fractionated and agitated versus non-agitated KE canister sludge also were tested as well as floor and pit sludge from areas in the KE Basin that had not previously been sampled (Bryan et al 2004). The objective of the third test series was to determine uranium metal concentration in K East Basin North Loadout Pit sludge and gas generation from sludge waste forms (Mellinger et al 2004). …”
Section: Uranium Metal Concentration By Gas Generation and Releasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantities of uranium metal present in sludge samples have been estimated based on these individual reactions and their summations in the characterization testing for sludge gas generation , Bryan et al 2004, and Mellinger et al 2004). …”
Section: Uranium Metal Concentration By Gas Generation and Releasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another example of sludge hardening under water-saturated conditions, significant physical resistance was encountered at 13 inches and 10 inches from the floor while driving an isolation tube (a pipe) into the ~36-inch thick sludge layer of uranium-poor K East Basin North Loadout Pit in December 2003 during a sampling operation. The resistance may have indicated that the sludge hardened at this level (Mellinger et al 2004), though this resistance could have been inpart caused by buried debris in the sludge as well in some instances. Other instances of sludge selfcementation (hardpans) have been encountered during K Basin sludge retrieval operations.…”
Section: Cerclamentioning
confidence: 99%