2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-016-3581-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of 131I scintigraphy and stimulated thyroglobulin levels in the follow up of patients with DTC: a retrospective analysis of 1420 patients

Abstract: A complete omission of DxWBS in the post-RRA surveillance of DTC is justified once DxWBS is negative and sTg is below the functional sensitivity (with no evidence of thyroglobulin antibodies), as patients showing this combination of test results (especially 12 months after RRA) show an at worst marginal risk of recurrence. In all other cases DxWBS may still be justified.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of Dx-WBS in lowrisk patients is generally discouraged if serum Tg is undetectable and neck ultrasound is negative at the first response assessment. However, an analysis by Gonzalez-Carvalho et al of a large series of patients followed for up to 25 years suggested that routine Dx-WBS is useful at the first followup (6-12 months after RaIT) in all cases [58]. Moreover, there is agreement on the relevant role of Dx-WBS in patients who are positive for TgAb [59], or with extrathyroid uptake at post-therapy-WBS (pT-WBS) or large thyroid remnants precluding pT-WBS, and in selected cases based on individual risk profiles (e.g., isthmus location of malignant nodule).…”
Section: Long-term Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of Dx-WBS in lowrisk patients is generally discouraged if serum Tg is undetectable and neck ultrasound is negative at the first response assessment. However, an analysis by Gonzalez-Carvalho et al of a large series of patients followed for up to 25 years suggested that routine Dx-WBS is useful at the first followup (6-12 months after RaIT) in all cases [58]. Moreover, there is agreement on the relevant role of Dx-WBS in patients who are positive for TgAb [59], or with extrathyroid uptake at post-therapy-WBS (pT-WBS) or large thyroid remnants precluding pT-WBS, and in selected cases based on individual risk profiles (e.g., isthmus location of malignant nodule).…”
Section: Long-term Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Carvalho et al reported on only a marginal risk of recurrence in 1420 DTC patients if patients showed negative WBS and Tg levels at 12 months after RAI therapy [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown previously that [ 131 I]iodine WBS/SPECT-CT is inferior to TG levels in detecting patients that develop metastases or local recurrence [ 18 ]. Gonzalez Carvalho et al stated that up to 25% of patients with recurrent DTC had two subsequent negative [ 131 I]iodine dxWBS image acquisitions [ 18 ]. This indicates that [ 131 I]iodine dxWBS is not ideal for detecting recurrent DTC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%