2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-128x(02)00165-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of 17α-E-(trifluoromethylphenyl)vinyl estradiols as novel estrogen receptor ligands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the observed RBA was comparable with E2 with 17α-etinyl group that increases log P C by 0.08 corresponding to 2-fold increase in RBA. Possible explanation of this discrepancy between estimated and observed binding affinities is remodeling of H7 into an extended conformation for the accommodation of the bulky trifluoromethylphenylvinyl group [41] that likely destabilizes the protein structure. Comparison of these results with the prediction results based on docked conformations showed that the misidentification of hydrogen bonds (17α E2) and overestimation of log P C (ethinyl E2), due to the incorrect protein-ligand complex structure, resulted in significant prediction error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the observed RBA was comparable with E2 with 17α-etinyl group that increases log P C by 0.08 corresponding to 2-fold increase in RBA. Possible explanation of this discrepancy between estimated and observed binding affinities is remodeling of H7 into an extended conformation for the accommodation of the bulky trifluoromethylphenylvinyl group [41] that likely destabilizes the protein structure. Comparison of these results with the prediction results based on docked conformations showed that the misidentification of hydrogen bonds (17α E2) and overestimation of log P C (ethinyl E2), due to the incorrect protein-ligand complex structure, resulted in significant prediction error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This compound binds even more tightly to the hERa than the natural ligand E 2, [28] which is probablyaresult of the increased number of hydrophobic contacts. Increased affinity due to extra hydrogen bonds between fluorinea nd the hydrophilic amino acids in the ligand binding cavity is not likely because the fluorine atomsa ttachedt ot he end of the hydrophobic chain are very weak hydrogen bond acceptors [29] (partial charge À0.34) and the distance between the fluorine atoms and the hydrophilic amino acids is quite large (3.6 ).…”
Section: Influence Of the Hydrophobic Pocket (Site 2)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This trend is similar to that previously observed for the mono-trifluoromethylated series. [7] Introduction of a second methyl group onto the phenylvinyl moiety expanded the range of RBA values for the series and identified the influence of the second substituent. For example, 2-(ortho)-substitution was still optimal but the highest affinity was observed for those compounds in which the second methyl group was either in the 5-(meta)- (RBA = 37) or 4-(para)- position (RBA = 20.5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] Subsequent examination of the E-(2-,3-, and 4-trifluoromethylphenyl)vinyl estradiols demonstrated significant dependence on substitution patterns, as the 2-isomer was more potent in vitro as well as in vivo . [7] Introduction of an 11β-methoxy group into the E-(2-,3-, and 4-trifluoromethylphenyl)vinyl estradiols had little effect on the affinity for the ER-LBD, however, it provided a significant enhancement of in vivo potency. [8] In parallel with biological assays, we used computational and crystallographic methods to evaluate the results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%