2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a diatom eDNA-based technique for assessing water quality variations in tropical lakes and reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, challenges such as the necessity for region-specific indices due to regional variation and the requirement for taxonomic expertise to avoid misidentification and inaccurate assessments persist. The laborious process of collecting and analyzing diatom samples raises concerns about the practicality of the index and the potential for delays in diatom response, thus affecting the timeliness of ecosystem health assessments [32][33][34].…”
Section: The Evolution Of Microscopy-enabled Diatom-based Water Quali...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, challenges such as the necessity for region-specific indices due to regional variation and the requirement for taxonomic expertise to avoid misidentification and inaccurate assessments persist. The laborious process of collecting and analyzing diatom samples raises concerns about the practicality of the index and the potential for delays in diatom response, thus affecting the timeliness of ecosystem health assessments [32][33][34].…”
Section: The Evolution Of Microscopy-enabled Diatom-based Water Quali...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others proposed taxonomy-free indexes (Apotheloz-Perret- Gentil et al, 2017). However, little congruence has been observed when these methods are compared with morphology-based methods at the species level in tropical environments (Kutty et al, 2022).…”
Section: Taxonomic Impedimentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also a significant proportion of macroinvertebrate taxa which do not have assigned indicator values, leading to confusion and inconsistencies in analytical approaches, with some authorities excluding/omitting them from site calculations and some creating indicator values based on their professional judgment ( Stark & Maxted, 2007 ). Importantly, both methods have limited taxonomic scope, and do not include bioindicators with rapid generation times that respond quickly to environmental disturbance, such as fungi, phytoplankton and bacteria which can be responsive indicators ( Kutty et al, 2022 ). Despite the drawbacks, and through necessity, biological assessment of both fish and macroinvertebrate communities is standard and common practice, and both attributes are now mandatory monitoring requirements for regional and unitary councils under the NPSFM ( New Zealand Ministry for the Environment, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%