Evaluation of a Dry EEG System for Application of Passive Brain-Computer Interfaces in Autonomous Driving

Abstract

We tested the applicability and signal quality of a 16 channel dry electroencephalography (EEG) system in a laboratory environment and in a car under controlled, realistic conditions. The aim of our investigation was an estimation how well a passive Brain-Computer Interface (pBCI) can work in an autonomous driving scenario. The evaluation considered speed and accuracy of self-applicability by an untrained person, quality of recorded EEG data, shifts of electrode positions on the head after driving-related movements, usability, and complexity of the system as such and wearing comfort over time. An experiment was conducted inside and outside of a stationary vehicle with running engine, air-conditioning, and muted radio. Signal quality was sufficient for standard EEG analysis in the time and frequency domain as well as for the use in pBCIs. While the influence of vehicle-induced interferences to data quality was insignificant, driving-related movements led to strong shifts in electrode positions. In general, the EEG system used allowed for a fast self-applicability of cap and electrodes. The assessed usability of the system was still acceptable while the wearing comfort decreased strongly over time due to friction and pressure to the head. From these results we conclude that the evaluated system should provide the essential requirements for an application in an autonomous driving context. Nevertheless, further refinement is suggested to reduce shifts of the system due to body movements and increase the headset's usability and wearing comfort.

Direct Assessment of Alcohol Consumption in Mental State Using Brain Computer Interfaces and Grammatical Evolution

“…Concerning the advantages of an alcohol-related EEG analysis, studies have employed EEG recording devices for in-vehicle systems [22,23]. Alcohol intake affects a driver's mental state resulting in fatigue and drowsiness [24], which increases dramatically the risk of a fatal car accident.…”

Evaluation of EEG Headset Mounting for Brain-Computer Interface-Based Stroke Rehabilitation by Patients, Therapists, and Relatives

“…The therapist can then spend more time on other types of training and patients, or the patients could be training in their own home. Many of the caps currently commercially available may be difficult to mount by oneself since the electrodes must cover the motor cortex to record the electrical activity associated with attempted movements, and only a few comparisons between headsets or headset usability have been made (Ekandem et al, 2012;Mayaud et al, 2013;Das et al, 2014;Hairston et al, 2014;Nijboer et al, 2015;Halford et al, 2016;Izdebski et al, 2016;Pinegger et al, 2016;Käthner et al, 2017;Zander et al, 2017;Radüntz and Meffert, 2019). These studies relied on different metrics but often report on comfort and setup time.…”

Automagic: Standardized Preprocessing of Big EEG Data

“…A range of alternative quality metrics (that are not included in toolboxes), are based on the ratio of signal and noise in specific paradigms. Some quality metrics have been proposed that are related to the amplitude or spectral power of certain ERP events or time-windows Zander et al 2017;Chi et al 2012;Ries et al 2014;Fiedler et al 2015). For resting state EEG, signal-to-noise has been quantified by means of the extent of the alpha block, or frontal theta in eyes-closed versus eyes-open conditions (Radüntz 2018) or more generally the alpha band compared to the PSD ratio (Liu et al 2019).…”